Skip to content

Inconsistent audit values: 3 protocols have audits=6 while legend only defines 0-3 #10470

@swywssaid

Description

@swywssaid

Description

The audit legend defines values 0–3, but there are 3 protocols in the API response with audits: 6.

Expected Behavior

According to the audit legend:

  • 0 -> No audits
  • 1 -> Part of this protocol may be unaudited
  • 2 -> Yes (fully audited)
  • 3 -> This protocol is a fork of an existing audited protocol

All protocols should have audit values within this range (0–3).

Actual Behavior

3 protocols have audits: 6:

  1. ACryptoS (slug: acryptos)
  2. Juicebox V3 (slug: juicebox-v3)
  3. Api3 (slug: api3)

At the moment it is unclear whether the value 6 carries some special meaning(e.g., legacy flag, undocumented state) or if it is simply erroneous data. Either way, this inconsistency suggests that the docs and/or the protocol data need to be updated to clarify. The legend should reflect all valid values, or the data should be corrected to fit within the documented 0–3 range.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions