Replies: 5 comments
-
@eloycoto Thank you so much for pointing this out. There is support for this in the interpreter but the AST is written in such a way that it disallows it. I will fix this shortly. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I can confirm that this change do the job
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
great to see this update. any chance you might push a new release (0.1.1) before the end of the year? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@creatorsagi yes absolutely |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@eloycoto The change is now in main (PR #221). We will make a release shortly @creatorsagi |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
When the LLM reply with multiple tools, the arguments can be different. In pdl, the
args
is a object that can be like this:The problem is when the arguments for the function need to be parsed/object from another output, that it's not possible to send the result object to the
callBlock.args
parameter, as example:I can create a function like this:
But that has a problem, all arguments are a single string, and it's prone to errors, and hard to reuse it.
Is there any way to pass the resulting object to the functionBlock.args? I do not think so
@vazirim @mandel If you can have a look, it'll be great :)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions