[frontend/backend] Remove expectation result empties in front

[savacano28]

Proposed changes

BackEnd

• Update expectation result with a computeValue fo expectations or contentInject, if expectations existent then I send them in other case I extract the expectations defined into de inject contract (content). -> New InjectExpectationMapper (logic extraction ExpectationResults)
• Modifiy dtos with expectationResults: exercise, GlobalScoreBySimulationEndDate, AttackPattern, Inject, Atomic
• Features related: Injects/atomics/Simualtions/scenarios/Matrix attacks/HomeDahsboards

FrontEnd

• Refact ResponsePie in order to just show expectations existents.
• Refact AtomicResult to show only expectation Results existents
• Refact ScenarioDistributionByExercise to show only result from expectation defined

Testing Instructions

1. Create inject with x type of expectation
2. Check the Pie chart in the overview of inject, check also for the targets
3. For simulation, check pie charts, attacks matrix, and inject results
4. In Home, check last simaltion, pie charts

Observations/comments:

** In the case where an inject has been executed and the expectations are met, and the user updates the inject content, the expectation result shown is the expectation related to the current execution (then this new type of expectation is not shown).
** Improvements: We should calculate the global score asynchronously as in ScenarioDistributionByExercise.

Related issues

• Closes Hide the expectation scores not used #3648

Checklist

• I consider the submitted work as finished
• I tested the code for its functionality
• I wrote test cases for the relevant uses case
• I added/update the relevant documentation (either on github or on notion)
• Where necessary I refactored code to improve the overall quality
• For bug fix -> I implemented a test that covers the bug

Further comments

If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 64.77273% with 62 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 44.89%. Comparing base (3aad4fd) to head (14a0b13).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
.../openbas/utils/mapper/InjectExpectationMapper.java	45.58%	33 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️
...tion/handler/ScenarioNotificationEventHandler.java	0.00%	5 Missing ⚠️
...n/java/io/openbas/service/InjectSearchService.java	0.00%	5 Missing ⚠️
...n/java/io/openbas/rest/statistic/StatisticApi.java	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
...vice/targets/search/HelperTargetSearchAdaptor.java	81.25%	2 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...pi/src/main/java/io/openbas/utils/ResultUtils.java	57.14%	3 Missing ⚠️
...openbas/rest/exercise/service/ExerciseService.java	66.66%	2 Missing ⚠️
...n/java/io/openbas/utils/mapper/ExerciseMapper.java	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
...ain/java/io/openbas/rest/exercise/ExerciseApi.java	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
...io/openbas/utils/InjectExpectationResultUtils.java	93.33%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #3661      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     44.97%   44.89%   -0.09%     
- Complexity     2852     2860       +8     
============================================
  Files           771      772       +1     
  Lines         23486    23485       -1     
  Branches       1643     1651       +8     
============================================
- Hits          10564    10543      -21     
- Misses        12325    12343      +18     
- Partials        597      599       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[RomuDeuxfois]

Everything seems to work as expected.
I create an issue which seems not relativ to your code
#3721

[savacano28]

@RomuDeuxfois I made the changes, ty!