Skip to content

Feature Request: async versions of functions? #145

Open
@eykd

Description

@eykd

Is there any interest in adding async versions of the functions here? This is such a useful toolkit in sync land, but the divide between iterators and async iterators is deep.

Between aiostream and asyncstdlib I can cobble together most of what I need, but the naming is subtly different from my go-to funcy, and the libraries use different conventions (e.g. aiostream.stream.skip(myiter, 5) vs. funcy.drop(5, myiter).

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions