AutoFarm enhancements #846
Conversation
-Harvest first option -Check line of sight option -Choose fortune, silk touch tool -Harvest exclusions
|
This pull request has been open for a while with no recent activity. If you're still working on this or waiting for a review, please add a comment or commit within the next 7 days to keep it open. Otherwise, the pull request will be automatically closed to free up time for other tasks. Pull requests should be closed if:
|
|
Still relevant. |
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe recent update to the AutoFarmHack class enhances the automation of farming by introducing settings that allow for more refined control over the farming process. These settings include designating certain blocks to be harvested with fortune tools, excluding certain blocks from being harvested, and checking for line of sight before performing actions. Additionally, inventory management has been improved to identify specific items within the player's inventory, catering to the need for using specialized tools like Fortune pickaxes on crops. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChat with CodeRabbit Bot (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (3)
- src/main/java/net/wurstclient/hacks/AutoFarmHack.java (1 hunks)
- src/main/java/net/wurstclient/util/BlockBreaker.java (1 hunks)
- src/main/java/net/wurstclient/util/InventoryUtils.java (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 11
src/main/java/net/wurstclient/util/BlockBreaker.java (1)
- 32-43: The addition of the
checkLOSparameter to thebreakOneBlockmethod is a logical enhancement that aligns with the PR objectives to check line of sight before breaking blocks. Ensure that thelineOfSightproperty inBlockBreakingParamsis correctly determined and used in all relevant places wherebreakOneBlockis called.Verification successful
- The
BlockBreakingParamsconstructor is being called with alinesOfSightparameter, indicating that the line of sight is being considered when creatingBlockBreakingParamsinstances.- The
breakOneBlockmethod has an overload that defaults thecheckLOSparameter tofalse, which is consistent with the PR's intent to add a line of sight check.Based on the script output, the changes related to the
checkLOSparameter in thebreakOneBlockmethod and the handling of thelineOfSightproperty inBlockBreakingParamsappear to be implemented correctly. However, there is no evidence ofbreakOneBlockbeing called withcheckLOSset totrue, which may need to be verified manually if such calls are expected in the codebase.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the lineOfSight property is being set correctly in BlockBreakingParams ast-grep --lang java --pattern $'new BlockBreakingParams($_, $_, $_, $_.lineOfSight)' # Verify that the breakOneBlock method is called with the checkLOS parameter where needed ast-grep --lang java --pattern $'breakOneBlock($_, true)'Length of output: 145
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the instantiation of BlockBreakingParams without assuming the lineOfSight property ast-grep --lang java --pattern $'new BlockBreakingParams($$$)' # Verify any calls to breakOneBlock to see how it's being used throughout the codebase ast-grep --lang java --pattern $'breakOneBlock($$$)'Length of output: 457
src/main/java/net/wurstclient/util/InventoryUtils.java (1)
- 85-111: The implementation of the
indicesOfmethod is a good addition to theInventoryUtilsclass, allowing for the retrieval of all inventory slots that match a given predicate. This method should be tested to ensure it correctly handles edge cases, such as when no items match the predicate or when the inventory is full.src/main/java/net/wurstclient/hacks/AutoFarmHack.java (9)
56-58: The new setting
harvestFirstis added to prioritize harvesting over replanting. Ensure that the logic in theonUpdatemethod correctly respects this setting when deciding the order of operations.60-63: The
checkLOSsetting is introduced to ensure that actions are only taken on visible blocks. Verify that this setting is correctly used in thereplantandharvestmethods to prevent actions through walls.65-68: The
fortunesetting is added to select a fortune tool for harvesting crops. Verify that theharvestmethod uses this setting to choose the correct tool when harvesting blocks that benefit from the Fortune enchantment.70-73: The
silkTouchsetting is added for harvesting melons with a Silk Touch tool. Verify that theharvestmethod uses this setting to choose the correct tool when harvesting melons.75-76: The
excludedsetting is introduced to allow users to specify crops that should not be automatically harvested. Verify that theshouldBeHarvestedmethod correctly checks this list before deciding if a block should be harvested.90-98: The
fortuneBlocksmap has been changed to aHashSet. This is a positive change for performance since the map's values were not being used. Ensure that theharvestmethod correctly uses this set to determine if a block should be harvested with a Fortune tool.242-280: The
shouldBeHarvestedmethod has been modified to include a check for excluded blocks. Ensure that the binary search used for the exclusion check is correct and that the method's logic correctly identifies blocks that should be harvested.Verification successful
To verify the correctness of the binary search, we need to ensure two things:
- The list
excluded.getBlockNames()is sorted, as binary search requires a sorted list.- The output of
BlockUtils.getName(pos)is in a format that is compatible with the list used in the binary search.Let's start by checking if the
excluded.getBlockNames()list is sorted when it is retrieved.
The previous script did not yield the necessary information due to a pattern error. I will refine the pattern to correctly match the structure of the
AutoFarmHackclass and theshouldBeHarvestedmethod to verify if theexcluded.getBlockNames()list is sorted.
The current output does not provide information on whether the
excluded.getBlockNames()list is sorted. To verify the sorting of the list, we need to check theBlockListSettingclass or any related sorting mechanism that might be applied to the list when it is created or modified.
The output from the script provides the information we need:
- The
BlockListSettingclass contains anArrayList<String>calledblockNames.- The constructor of
BlockListSettingtakes an array of block names, processes them in parallel, and then sorts them before adding them toblockNames.- The sorting is done with the
sorted()method, which means the list is sorted in its natural order.This confirms that the
blockNameslist within theBlockListSettingclass is indeed sorted, which means the binary search used in theshouldBeHarvestedmethod is correct, provided that the list being searched is the one managed byBlockListSetting.Given this information, the review comment regarding the correctness of the binary search in the
shouldBeHarvestedmethod is verified as correct.* 316-384: The `replant` method has been modified to consider the `checkLOS` setting and the `excluded` list. Verify that the method correctly uses the `checkLOS` setting to check line of sight before replanting and that it skips blocks in the `excluded` list.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that excluded blocks are correctly formatted and can be found by binary search. rg --type java 'Collections.binarySearch\(excluded.getBlockNames\(\), BlockUtils.getName\(pos\)\) >= 0' src/main/java/net/wurstclient/hacks/AutoFarmHack.javaLength of output: 246
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the excluded.getBlockNames() list is sorted. ast-grep --lang java --pattern $'class AutoFarmHack { $$$ BlockListSetting excluded; $$$ boolean shouldBeHarvested($_) { $$$ Collections.binarySearch(excluded.getBlockNames(), $_) >= 0 $$$ } $$$ }'Length of output: 567
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Attempt to find any sorting mechanism applied to the excluded.getBlockNames() list before it's used in binary search. rg --type java 'excluded.getBlockNames\(\)' src/main/java/net/wurstclient/hacks/AutoFarmHack.javaLength of output: 186
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the BlockListSetting class for any sorting mechanism or method that sorts the block names list. rg --type java 'BlockListSetting' -A 10 src/main/java/net/wurstclient/settings/Length of output: 1603
- 386-459: The
harvestmethod has been modified to consider the newsilkTouchandfortunesettings. Verify that the method correctly selects the appropriate tool based on these settings and that it uses thecheckLOSsetting to check line of sight before harvesting.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 1
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (2)
- src/main/java/net/wurstclient/hacks/AutoFarmHack.java (9 hunks)
- src/main/java/net/wurstclient/util/InventoryUtils.java (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/main/java/net/wurstclient/util/InventoryUtils.java
Additional comments: 8
src/main/java/net/wurstclient/hacks/AutoFarmHack.java (8)
16-20: The new import statements are related to enchantments and items, which align with the PR's objectives to add tool selection based on enchantments.
34-37: The new import statements are related to settings, which align with the PR's objectives to add new options to the AutoFarm feature.
56-74: New settings
harvestFirst,checkLOS,fortune,silkTouch, andexcludedhave been added to theAutoFarmHackclass. Ensure that these settings are integrated correctly in the logic of the class and that their descriptions are clear to the end-user.Verification successful
The new settings in the
AutoFarmHackclass are being used as intended within the class logic, and their integration aligns with the PR objectives. The descriptions for these settings are also clear and consistent with their functionality.
* 88-96: The `fortuneBlocks` map has been changed to a `HashSet`. Verify that all instances where `fortuneBlocks` is used have been updated to work with a `HashSet` instead of a `HashMap`.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the new settings are used correctly in the logic of the class. rg --type java 'harvestFirst|checkLOS|fortune|silkTouch|excluded'Length of output: 5318
Verification successful
The usage of
fortuneBlocksas aHashSetin theAutoFarmHackclass is correct based on the provided search results. Thecontainsmethod is appropriate for aHashSetand is used properly.* 114-118: New settings have been added to the `AutoFarmHack` constructor. This is standard for initializing settings in the class.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the `fortuneBlocks` HashSet is used correctly in the logic of the class. rg --type java 'fortuneBlocks'Length of output: 814
- 184-195: The
onUpdatemethod now includes logic to handle the new settingsharvestFirstandcheckLOS. Ensure that the logic correctly prioritizes harvesting and checks line of sight as intended.Verification successful
The output from the script provides the necessary context to verify the implementation of the
harvestFirstsetting within theonUpdatemethod of theAutoFarmHack.javafile. Here's what we can infer from the code:
- The
harvestFirstsetting is checked, and if it is enabled (isChecked()returnstrue), theharvestmethod is called withblocksToHarvestas an argument.- After attempting to harvest, the code checks if
currentlyHarvestingisnull, which likely indicates that no harvesting is currently taking place. If that's the case, it proceeds to attempt replanting by calling thereplantmethod withblocksToReplant.- If
harvestFirstis not checked (isChecked()returnsfalse) and replanting is not happening (replantingisfalse), it then calls theharvestmethod.This logic aligns with the PR objectives, which include prioritizing harvesting when the
harvestFirstoption is enabled. However, the provided code snippet does not show the implementation of thecheckLOSsetting within theonUpdatemethod. To fully verify the review comment, we would need to see the parts of theonUpdatemethod wherecheckLOSis used to ensure that line of sight checks are correctly implemented as intended by the PR.Since the
checkLOSimplementation is not visible in the provided output, we need to view more of theonUpdatemethod or the implementations of theharvestandreplantmethods to confirm that the line of sight check is being considered.
The provided script output shows the implementations of the
harvestandreplantmethods within theAutoFarmHack.javafile. Here's what we can infer from the code:
- The
harvestmethod checks if the player is in creative mode and then processes theblocksToHarvestlist. There is no direct reference to thecheckLOSsetting within this method from the provided snippet.- The
replantmethod starts by checking the item use cooldown and then proceeds to find a held seed that matches the seeds needed forblocksToReplant. It then filters the blocks that need to be replanted with the held seed. Similar to theharvestmethod, there is no direct reference to thecheckLOSsetting within the provided snippet.The review comment specifically asked to ensure that the logic correctly prioritizes harvesting and checks line of sight as intended. While the prioritization of harvesting is confirmed by the
harvestFirst.isChecked()condition, the line of sight check (checkLOS) is not visible in the provided snippets of theharvestandreplantmethods.To fully verify the review comment, we would need to see the parts of the code where the
checkLOSsetting is actually used to ensure that line of sight checks are correctly implemented. Since thecheckLOSimplementation is not visible in the provided output, we need to view more of theharvestandreplantmethods or any other place in theonUpdatemethod wherecheckLOSmight be used.
The additional context provided from the script output still does not show any reference to the
checkLOSsetting within theharvestandreplantmethods. The snippets provided are identical to the previous ones and do not extend further into the method bodies where thecheckLOSlogic might be implemented.Given that the
checkLOSsetting is a critical part of the PR objectives, and its implementation is not visible in the provided snippets, we cannot confirm whether the line of sight check is correctly integrated into theAutoFarmHackfunctionality based on the current information.To complete the verification, we would need to see the full implementation of the
harvestandreplantmethods or any other relevant part of theonUpdatemethod where thecheckLOSsetting is applied. However, since the provided script outputs have not yielded the necessary information, we may need to consider a different approach or request more extensive snippets of the code.For now, based on the information available, we can verify the following:
- The
harvestFirstsetting is correctly implemented in theonUpdatemethod to prioritize harvesting.- The implementation of the
checkLOSsetting cannot be verified with the provided snippets.To proceed, we should attempt to view more of the
harvestandreplantmethods or any other relevant sections where thecheckLOSsetting might be used.
The new script output provides additional context for the
harvestandreplantmethods within theAutoFarmHack.javafile. Here's what we can infer from the code:
- The
harvestmethod includes logic for handling thesilkTouchandfortunesettings when breaking blocks. However, there is still no direct reference to thecheckLOSsetting within theharvestmethod from the provided snippet.- The
replantmethod includes a check for thecheckLOSsetting. IfcheckLOS.isChecked()returnstrue, it ensures that there is a line of sight to the block before proceeding with the action. This is done by callingparams.lineOfSight()and continuing the loop if there is no line of sight, effectively skipping the block.With this information, we can now verify the following:
- The
harvestFirstsetting is correctly implemented in theonUpdatemethod to prioritize harvesting.- The
checkLOSsetting is correctly implemented in thereplantmethod to ensure that blocks are only replanted if they are within the line of sight.Based on the provided context, the review comment regarding the correct implementation of the
harvestFirstandcheckLOSsettings in theonUpdatemethod has been verified. The logic appears to prioritize harvesting and checks the line of sight as intended by the PR objectives.* 345-346: The `replant` method now checks line of sight before replanting based on the `checkLOS` setting. Verify that the line of sight check is implemented correctly and efficiently.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the new settings are used correctly in the logic of the `onUpdate` method. rg --type java 'onUpdate'Length of output: 9375
Script:
#!/bin/bash # View the content of the `onUpdate` method in the `AutoFarmHack.java` file to verify the implementation of the new settings. rg --type java -A 30 'public void onUpdate\(\)' src/main/java/net/wurstclient/hacks/AutoFarmHack.javaLength of output: 1312
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Continue viewing the content of the `onUpdate` method in the `AutoFarmHack.java` file to verify the implementation of the new settings. rg --type java -A 30 -B 10 'harvestFirst\.isChecked\(\)' src/main/java/net/wurstclient/hacks/AutoFarmHack.javaLength of output: 1387
Script:
#!/bin/bash # View the implementation of the `harvest` and `replant` methods to verify the `checkLOS` setting usage. rg --type java -A 20 -B 2 'private void harvest\(' src/main/java/net/wurstclient/hacks/AutoFarmHack.java rg --type java -A 20 -B 2 'private boolean replant\(' src/main/java/net/wurstclient/hacks/AutoFarmHack.javaLength of output: 1751
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Continue viewing the content of the `harvest` and `replant` methods to verify the `checkLOS` setting usage. rg --type java -A 20 'private void harvest\(' src/main/java/net/wurstclient/hacks/AutoFarmHack.java rg --type java -A 20 'private boolean replant\(' src/main/java/net/wurstclient/hacks/AutoFarmHack.javaLength of output: 1727
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Attempt to view more of the `harvest` and `replant` methods to find the `checkLOS` setting usage. rg --type java -A 40 'private void harvest\(' src/main/java/net/wurstclient/hacks/AutoFarmHack.java rg --type java -A 40 'private boolean replant\(' src/main/java/net/wurstclient/hacks/AutoFarmHack.javaLength of output: 3138
Verification successful
To verify the correct implementation of the line of sight check within the
replantmethod, I will need to see the full context of the method's code. I will generate a script to extract the method's implementation from theAutoFarmHack.javafile.
I will generate a new script using a more general
ast-greppattern to locate thereplantmethod within theAutoFarmHackclass.
I will generate a new script using
rgto search for thereplantmethod definition within theAutoFarmHack.javafile to provide the necessary context.
I will generate a new script using
rgto extend the context of the search to ensure we capture the full body of thereplantmethod.
I will generate a new script using
rgto further extend the context of the search to capture the rest of thereplantmethod body.
The line of sight check in the
replantmethod is implemented correctly. The method checks if thecheckLOSsetting is enabled and then verifies the line of sight before proceeding with replanting. If the line of sight is not clear, it continues to the next block, thus adhering to the intended functionality described in the review comment.* 407-461: The `harvest` method now includes logic for selecting tools with silk touch and fortune enchantments. Ensure that the tool selection process is efficient and that it correctly prioritizes axes for silk touch when harvesting melons.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the line of sight check is implemented correctly in the `replant` method. rg --type java 'replant'Length of output: 1597
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the implementation of the `replant` method from AutoFarmHack.java ast-grep --lang java --pattern $'class AutoFarmHack { $$$ private boolean replant($_) { $$$ } $$$ }'Length of output: 115
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Attempt to locate the `replant` method within the `AutoFarmHack` class using a more general pattern ast-grep --lang java --pattern $'class AutoFarmHack { $$$ private boolean replant($$$) { $$$ } $$$ }'Length of output: 116
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Use ripgrep to find the definition of the replant method in AutoFarmHack.java rg --type java --context 10 'private boolean replant' src/main/java/net/wurstclient/hacks/AutoFarmHack.javaLength of output: 866
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extend the context of the search to capture the full body of the replant method rg --type java --context 30 'private boolean replant' src/main/java/net/wurstclient/hacks/AutoFarmHack.javaLength of output: 2460
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Further extend the context of the search to capture the rest of the replant method body rg --type java --context 50 'private boolean replant' src/main/java/net/wurstclient/hacks/AutoFarmHack.javaLength of output: 3694
Verification successful
To verify the logic for selecting tools with silk touch and fortune enchantments within the
harvestmethod, we need to view the implementation details of this method. Let's usergto print the lines around theharvestmethod definition to understand the logic.
The provided output does not contain the specific logic for tool selection within the
harvestmethod. We need to extend our search to capture more lines following the method definition to review the tool selection logic. Let's run anotherrgcommand to get more lines after theharvestmethod definition.
The provided output still does not contain the specific logic for tool selection within the
harvestmethod. We need to extend our search further to capture the entire method body where the tool selection logic is implemented. Let's run anotherrgcommand to get the complete method body.
The provided output shows the relevant part of the
harvestmethod where the tool selection logic for silk touch and fortune enchantments is implemented. The code checks if silk touch is checked and the block is a melon, or if fortune is checked and the block is in thefortuneBlocksset. It then selects the tool accordingly. Here's the breakdown of the logic:
For silk touch:
- If the held item does not have silk touch or is not an axe, it searches the inventory for an axe with silk touch.
- If no axe with silk touch is found, it searches for any item with silk touch.
For fortune:
- It searches for items without silk touch but with fortune.
- It then selects the item with the highest level of fortune that is greater than the level on the currently held item.
This logic appears to prioritize axes for silk touch when harvesting melons, as specified in the review comment. It also correctly prioritizes tools with the fortune enchantment for blocks in the
fortuneBlocksset. The method seems to be efficient in its selection process, as it first checks the currently held item before searching the inventory, and it selects the tool with the highest enchantment level for fortune.Based on the provided code snippet, the tool selection process in the
harvestmethod is both efficient and correct, adhering to the requirements mentioned in the review comment.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the tool selection process in the `harvest` method is efficient and correct. rg --type java 'harvest'Length of output: 1492
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Print the lines around the `harvest` method definition to understand the tool selection logic. rg --type java -C 10 'private void harvest\(List<BlockPos> blocksToHarvest\)' src/main/java/net/wurstclient/hacks/AutoFarmHack.javaLength of output: 809
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Print more lines following the `harvest` method definition to capture the tool selection logic. rg --type java -C 20 'private void harvest\(List<BlockPos> blocksToHarvest\)' src/main/java/net/wurstclient/hacks/AutoFarmHack.javaLength of output: 1412
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Print the complete `harvest` method body to review the tool selection logic. rg --type java -C 40 'private void harvest\(List<BlockPos> blocksToHarvest\)' src/main/java/net/wurstclient/hacks/AutoFarmHack.javaLength of output: 2733
Alexander01998
added
type:enhancement
2 participants
Closes #822. I added various enhancements to AutoFarm.
-Harvest all nearby crops first option
-Check line of sight option
-An option to select a fortune tool for breaking crops, and a silk touch tool for breaking melons
-Exclusion list for harvesting