Replies: 1 comment
-
|
If you haven't already, see jj to support similar workflows in a more principled manner. Besides the
It's possible in principle to have git-branchless notify itself in-memory about rewrites it performed,
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
The feature of git-branchless I'm most interested in using is
git moveand possiblygit sync. I'm curious what would happen if I were to delete the.git/hooksthatgit branchlesssets up. Would these commands still work? Would they work but only in a degraded state?If it wouldn't work at all, I'd love to be able to read a discussion of what these commands and the hooks themselves do at a high level, so that I can update my own mental model of how
git branchlessworks.Currently I'm assuming that the hooks work in support of features like
git undoand the ability to track commits not associated with a branch. But if I only plan to usegit movefor the sake of rebasing trees of commits reachable from branches, andgit movewouldn't be expected to work for this use case without.git/hooks, I'd be curious to learn more.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions