Account cooldown appeal — submitted via wrong method initially

[ithiria894]

Hi @hesreallyhim,

I submitted Claude Code Organizer (#1099) a few days ago but used a regular issue instead of the web form — I didn't read the CONTRIBUTING doc carefully enough. That was my mistake.

When it was closed, I resubmitted today (#1196) using the correct web form template this time. However, I didn't realize there was an active cooldown from the first closure, so the system escalated it to a permanent restriction.

I understand the anti-spam measures are necessary and I respect them. I'm just asking if the permanent restriction could be reconsidered, since the root cause was a formatting mistake on the first submission, not spam.

Repo: https://github.com/mcpware/claude-code-organizer

Claude Code Organizer has 176 stars in 6 days, 138 E2E tests, zero telemetry, and is published on npm and the Official MCP Registry. Happy to answer any questions about the project.

Thanks for maintaining this list — it's a great resource for the community.

[ithiria894]

To add some context — when the first issue (#1099) was closed, I did not read the cooldown notice carefully enough and resubmitted before the 7 days were up. That was my mistake.

However, the escalation from a 7-day cooldown to a permanent ban with no intermediate warning was unexpected. There is no way to check whether a cooldown is still active before submitting, and no confirmation step that warns "you are currently in a cooldown period — submitting now will extend the restriction."

I'd suggest adding a visible cooldown status or a pre-submission check, so good-faith submitters don't accidentally escalate themselves. A one-line warning before the Create button would have prevented this entirely.

[ithiria894]

For what it's worth — Claude Code Organizer fills a gap that no other tool in the ecosystem currently covers:

• Only tool that combines scope visualization + security scanning + context budget + config management in one package. Standalone scanners (AgentSeal, mcp-shield, Pipelock) report findings but can't act on them. CCO lets you click a finding and navigate directly to the MCP entry to delete or move it.
• Only tool that shows Claude Code's full scope hierarchy (Global → Workspace → Project) with drag-and-drop between scopes. No other tool visualizes where configs actually load or lets you move them.
• Only tool that calculates per-item context budget with @import expansion, always-loaded vs deferred split, and inheritance across scopes.
• Security scanner with 60+ detection patterns and deobfuscation (zero-width chars, bidi controls, base64 decoding, leetspeak normalization) — sourced from Cisco YARA, AgentSeal, Pipelock, and MCPhound.

Traction: 176 stars in 6 days, 1,300+ weekly npm downloads, 138 E2E tests, published on npm + Glama + Official MCP Registry. Zero telemetry, zero network requests.

I think it would be a genuinely useful addition to the list for anyone managing Claude Code at scale.

[hesreallyhim]

@ithiria894 if it's an awesome resource, I'll share it. The restriction is not against your project. It is against your submitting things. And against spam.

[hesreallyhim]

Act I:

Act II:

FIN: