Where to put Ksh documentation?

[dnewhall]

Many years ago (circa-2010?), I taught some shell programming training. After that I expanded my notes to have all the Ksh93-specific features documented (since I was all-in on Ksh93 at the time). I've since found them and have expanded them even more from time to time for my own personal use. It's about 22 articles/topics and the word count is somewhere north of 10,000.

I'm feeling like these notes should be distributed somewhere since there's so little Ksh information out in the wild for new users. The question is where should these be placed.

Options:

1. Rework into some standard format (info? Markdown? Ksh's man format?) and distribute them with ksh93u+m: Requires buy-in from McDutchie, and would entail some serious reformatting, I think. Also, I'm not sure how to make things like my advice on, say, proper heredoc use be shoehorned into official-sounding documentation.

2. Dump everything into this project's wiki page: The wiki is there, but unused. But does anyone look at the wiki? Or is not looking at Github project wikis just a personal bias of mine?

3. Create a totally new webpage: Something like masteringkornshell dot something. It would boost search results for ksh (bash has a bajillion semi-official guides to it out there), but at the expense of maintaining another resource.

[rwmills]

I think that you should kill your 'wiki bias' and place them there.

Do you have anything on User Defined Types (typeset -T) that first appeared in 93t (I think). If you do then could you send me a copy?