capacity: fix duplicate topology

When the controller starts, 2 sync() all will run simultaneously, one from HasSynced(), another from processNextWorkItem(). Each will produce an instance for the same topology segment, and pass it to callbacks.

This will result in duplicated entries in capacities map, resulting in: either
- Two CSIStorageCapacity object get created for the same topology, or
- The same CSIStorageCapacity object get assigned to two keys in capacities map. When one of them is updated, the other one will hold an outdated object and all subsequent update will fail with conflict.

Author: huww98

pkg/capacity/topology/nodes.go

@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ import (
 	"reflect"
 	"sort"
 	"sync"
+	"sync/atomic"
 
 	v1 "k8s.io/api/core/v1"
 	storagev1 "k8s.io/api/storage/v1"
@@ -159,6 +160,7 @@ type nodeTopology struct {
 	nodeInformer    coreinformersv1.NodeInformer
 	csiNodeInformer storageinformersv1.CSINodeInformer
 	queue           workqueue.TypedRateLimitingInterface[string]
+	hasSynced       atomic.Bool
 
 	mutex sync.Mutex
 	// segments hold a list of all currently known topology segments.
@@ -209,14 +211,20 @@ func (nt *nodeTopology) RunWorker(ctx context.Context) {
 	}
 }
 
+func (nt *nodeTopology) upstreamSynced() bool {
+	return nt.nodeInformer.Informer().HasSynced() &&
+		nt.csiNodeInformer.Informer().HasSynced()
+}
+
 func (nt *nodeTopology) HasSynced() bool {
-	if nt.nodeInformer.Informer().HasSynced() &&
-		nt.csiNodeInformer.Informer().HasSynced() {
-		// Now that both informers are up-to-date, use that
-		// information to update our own view of the world.
-		nt.sync(context.Background())
+	if nt.hasSynced.Load() {
 		return true
 	}
+	if nt.upstreamSynced() {
+		// Now that both informers are up-to-date,
+		// trigger a sync to update the list of topology segments.
+		nt.queue.Add("")
+	}
 	return false
 }
 
@@ -231,6 +239,11 @@ func (nt *nodeTopology) processNextWorkItem(ctx context.Context) bool {
 }
 
 func (nt *nodeTopology) sync(_ context.Context) {
+	if !nt.hasSynced.Load() && nt.upstreamSynced() {
+		// We are not yet synced, but the upstream informers are.
+		// we will become synced when this function returns
+		defer nt.hasSynced.Store(true)
+	}
 	// For all nodes on which the driver is registered, collect the topology key/value pairs
 	// and sort them by key name to make the result deterministic. Skip all segments that have
 	// been seen before.

pkg/capacity/topology/nodes_test.go

@@ -566,6 +566,41 @@ func TestNodeTopology(t *testing.T) {
 	}
 }
 
+func TestHasSynced(t *testing.T) {
+	client := fakeclientset.NewSimpleClientset()
+	informerFactory := informers.NewSharedInformerFactory(client, 0*time.Second /* no resync */)
+	nodeInformer := informerFactory.Core().V1().Nodes()
+	csiNodeInformer := informerFactory.Storage().V1().CSINodes()
+	rateLimiter := workqueue.NewTypedItemExponentialFailureRateLimiter[string](time.Second, 2*time.Second)
+	queue := workqueue.NewTypedRateLimitingQueueWithConfig(rateLimiter, workqueue.TypedRateLimitingQueueConfig[string]{Name: "items"})
+
+	nt := NewNodeTopology(
+		driverName,
+		client,
+		nodeInformer,
+		csiNodeInformer,
+		queue,
+	).(*nodeTopology)
+
+	ctx := t.Context()
+	nt.sync(ctx)
+	if nt.HasSynced() {
+		t.Fatalf("upstream informer not started yet, expected HasSynced to return false")
+	}
+
+	informerFactory.Start(ctx.Done())
+	informerFactory.WaitForCacheSync(ctx.Done())
+	if nt.HasSynced() { // should enqueue a work item
+		t.Fatalf("nt not started, expected HasSynced to return false")
+	}
+
+	// consume the work item
+	nt.processNextWorkItem(ctx)
+	if !nt.HasSynced() {
+		t.Fatalf("nt should be synced now")
+	}
+}
+
 type segmentsFound map[*Segment]bool
 
 func (sf segmentsFound) Found() []*Segment {