Merge pull request #461 from tnull/2025-02-bump-on-htlcresolution-nonetheless

Only skip bumping channel closes for trusted peers

Author: tnull

src/config.rs

@@ -210,13 +210,11 @@ pub struct AnchorChannelsConfig {
 	/// on-chain.
 	///
 	/// Channels with these peers won't count towards the retained on-chain reserve and we won't
-	/// take any action to get the required transactions confirmed ourselves.
+	/// take any action to get the required channel closing transactions confirmed ourselves.
 	///
 	/// **Note:** Trusting the channel counterparty to take the necessary actions to get the
-	/// required Anchor spending and HTLC transactions confirmed on-chain is potentially insecure
-	/// as the channel may not be closed if they refuse to do so, potentially leaving the user
-	/// funds stuck *or* even allow the counterparty to steal any in-flight funds after the
-	/// corresponding HTLCs time out.
+	/// required Anchor spending transactions confirmed on-chain is potentially insecure
+	/// as the channel may not be closed if they refuse to do so.
 	pub trusted_peers_no_reserve: Vec<PublicKey>,
 	/// The amount of satoshis per anchors-negotiated channel with an untrusted peer that we keep
 	/// as an emergency reserve in our on-chain wallet.
@@ -228,9 +226,9 @@ pub struct AnchorChannelsConfig {
 	/// [`AnchorChannelsConfig::trusted_peers_no_reserve`], we will always try to spend the Anchor
 	/// outputs with *any* on-chain funds available, i.e., the total reserve value as well as any
 	/// spendable funds available in the on-chain wallet. Therefore, this per-channel multiplier is
-	/// really a emergencey reserve that we maintain at all time to reduce reduce the risk of
+	/// really a emergency reserve that we maintain at all time to reduce reduce the risk of
 	/// insufficient funds at time of a channel closure. To this end, we will refuse to open
-	/// outbound or accept inbound channels if we don't have sufficient on-chain funds availble to
+	/// outbound or accept inbound channels if we don't have sufficient on-chain funds available to
 	/// cover the additional reserve requirement.
 	///
 	/// **Note:** Depending on the fee market at the time of closure, this reserve amount might or

src/event.rs

@@ -1373,30 +1373,29 @@ where
 				}
 			},
 			LdkEvent::BumpTransaction(bte) => {
-				let (channel_id, counterparty_node_id) = match bte {
+				match bte {
 					BumpTransactionEvent::ChannelClose {
 						ref channel_id,
 						ref counterparty_node_id,
 						..
-					} => (channel_id, counterparty_node_id),
-					BumpTransactionEvent::HTLCResolution {
-						ref channel_id,
-						ref counterparty_node_id,
-						..
-					} => (channel_id, counterparty_node_id),
-				};
-
-				if let Some(anchor_channels_config) = self.config.anchor_channels_config.as_ref() {
-					if anchor_channels_config
-						.trusted_peers_no_reserve
-						.contains(counterparty_node_id)
-					{
-						log_debug!(self.logger,
-							"Ignoring BumpTransactionEvent for channel {} due to trusted counterparty {}",
-							channel_id, counterparty_node_id
-						);
-						return Ok(());
-					}
+					} => {
+						// Skip bumping channel closes if our counterparty is trusted.
+						if let Some(anchor_channels_config) =
+							self.config.anchor_channels_config.as_ref()
+						{
+							if anchor_channels_config
+								.trusted_peers_no_reserve
+								.contains(counterparty_node_id)
+							{
+								log_debug!(self.logger,
+									"Ignoring BumpTransactionEvent::ChannelClose for channel {} due to trusted counterparty {}",
+									channel_id, counterparty_node_id
+								);
+								return Ok(());
+							}
+						}
+					},
+					BumpTransactionEvent::HTLCResolution { .. } => {},
 				}
 
 				self.bump_tx_event_handler.handle_event(&bte);