You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hot-patch __ref_* variables should be placed in .rdata, not .data (#151008)
This is a refinment of #145565 . That PR added support for "Windows
Secure Hot-patching". In this design, functions that are compiled for
hot-patching need to be modified when they access mutable global
variables. The modification is to insert a level of indirection, the
so-called `__ref_*` variables.
Ref variables are supposed to be inserted into the `.rdata` section, not
`.data`. This provides a degree of protection against modification
(accidental or malicious) of ref variables during program execution.
When the Windows hot-patch subsystem loads a module as a hot-patch, it
finds all ref variables and changes the page protections for the pages
containing them to read/write. Then it sets the ref variables to point
to the real variable locations within the base image. Then it changes
page protections back to read-only.
This relies on the variables being placed in the `.rdata` section, not
`.data`.
However, it is still important that the LLVM `GlobalVariable` that is
created for the ref variable be created with `isConstant = false`. This
prevents LLVM from optimizing accesses to the `GlobalVariable`, i.e.
assuming that the variable can never change and thus inlining its value
into expressions that would ordinarily dereference it. That optimization
would defeat the purpose of hot-patching, so `isConstant = false` is
still the correct value for these ref variables.
0 commit comments