Updates to allow a Spine switch without VTEP #663
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
added 2 commits
October 30, 2025 20:44
- Added support for ignoring the spine role in Rule 208 - Added an IF statement to filter out the spine role for VTEP in jinja template
ccoueffe
approved these changes
Nov 3, 2025
Collaborator
ccoueffe
left a comment
ccoueffe
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM to resolve issue with role as spine only.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #662
Related Issue(s)
Related Collection Role
Related Data Model Element
Proposed Changes
Test Notes
Cisco Nexus Dashboard Version
Checklist