Skip to content

Authentication / Integrity #3

@stuartpb

Description

@stuartpb

I'm thinking it might make sense to require praisefile commits to be GPG authenticated, so people can't just go forging commits that skew people's words (or, worse, forging praisefiles altogether, in a twisted and wrong realization of prasefiles' intended purpose).

Furthermore, I've been thinking it might make sense to have a mechanism to ensure that, if the author of a praisefile wishes to amend what they said for whatever reason, the presence of that amendment is highly visible (so their earlier statement can't be misrepresented as reflective of their current feelings).

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions