Skip to content

Replace deprecated spin_until_future_complete #704

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Replace deprecated spin_until_future_complete #704

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

@hliberacki
Copy link

Replace deprecated spin_until_future_complete with spin_until_complete

Signed-off-by: Hubert Liberacki [email protected]

@hliberacki
Copy link
Author

Due to RCLCPP API change ros2/rclcpp#1874.

audrow
audrow requested changes Mar 31, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@audrow audrow left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change looks good to me, except I don't think that we should do the formatting changes as a part of this PR.

Perhaps another PR with the formatting changes is in order. Also, the code we have already passes our code style tests, so these changes may be unnecessary, unless we revise our coding styling standards, which would probably be a bigger discussion.

fujitatomoya
fujitatomoya requested changes Apr 1, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@fujitatomoya fujitatomoya left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm after https://github.com/ros2/ros2cli/pull/704/files#r840064950 is addressed.

@hliberacki hliberacki force-pushed the hliberacki/spin_until branch from 00b4317 to c80e8c8 Compare April 2, 2022 22:07
@hliberacki
Copy link
Author

hliberacki commented Apr 4, 2022 •
edited
Loading

ros2/rclcpp#1874 (comment) Passing CI with all related PRs linked and build together.

fujitatomoya
fujitatomoya approved these changes Apr 11, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@fujitatomoya fujitatomoya left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i am good to go.

@fujitatomoya
Copy link
Collaborator

@audrow requesting final review.

audrow
audrow approved these changes Jun 7, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@audrow audrow left a comment •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me with green CI in a recent CI run.

@clalancette clalancette added the more-information-needed Further information is required label Jun 23, 2022
@clalancette clalancette mentioned this pull request Jun 24, 2022
Merged
@wjwwood
Copy link
Member

wjwwood commented Jun 24, 2022

Since this is part of rclpy changes, it's blocked on ros2/rclpy#919 (review), but is not needed to fix CI after ros2/rclcpp#1874 was merged prematurely.

@fujitatomoya fujitatomoya mentioned this pull request Jun 24, 2022
Closed
@audrow audrow changed the base branch from master to rolling June 28, 2022 14:23
@fujitatomoya fujitatomoya mentioned this pull request Jan 23, 2023
Open
@christophebedard christophebedard mentioned this pull request Apr 2, 2024
Closed
@christophebedard
Copy link
Member

I've opened #893 to replace this PR.

@christophebedard
Copy link
Member

This can be closed, see #893 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@audrow audrow audrow approved these changes

@fujitatomoya fujitatomoya fujitatomoya approved these changes

+1 more reviewer

@SteveMacenski SteveMacenski SteveMacenski approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

more-information-needed Further information is required

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants

@hliberacki @fujitatomoya @wjwwood @christophebedard @audrow @SteveMacenski @clalancette