fix

Author: vkuma17

tests/pr_test.go

@@ -56,9 +56,11 @@ type Config struct {
 	GhTokenSecretId        string `yaml:"geretain-public-gh-token-dev-user"`
 	SubscriptionIdSecretId string `yaml:"geretain-appmod-ease4j-subscription-id"`
 	MQCapacityInstanceCRN  string `yaml:"mq_capacity_crn"`
+	PrivateOnlySecMgrCRN   string `yaml:"privateOnlySecMgrCRN"`
 }
 
 var smCRN string
+var privSmCRN string
 var ghTokenSecretId string
 var ghTokenSecretCRN string
 var subscriptionIdSecretId string
@@ -84,6 +86,7 @@ func TestMain(m *testing.M) {
 
 	// Parse the SM CRN from data and setting combined test input values used in TestRunDefaultExample and TestRunUpgradeExamplen
 	smCRN = config.SmCRN
+	privSmCRN = config.PrivateOnlySecMgrCRN
 	ghTokenSecretId = config.GhTokenSecretId               // pragma: allowlist secret
 	subscriptionIdSecretId = config.SubscriptionIdSecretId // pragma: allowlist secret
 	mqCapacityInstanceCRN = config.MQCapacityInstanceCRN
@@ -358,7 +361,7 @@ func TestAddonsDefaultConfiguration(t *testing.T) {
 			OfferingName:   "deploy-arch-ibm-secrets-manager",
 			OfferingFlavor: "fully-configurable",
 			Inputs: map[string]interface{}{
-				"existing_secrets_manager_crn":         permanentResources["privateOnlySecMgrCRN"],
+				"existing_secrets_manager_crn":         privSmCRN,
 				"service_plan":                         "__NULL__", // no plan value needed when using existing SM
 				"skip_secrets_manager_iam_auth_policy": true,       // since using an existing Secrets Manager instance, attempting to re-create auth policy can cause conflicts if the policy already exists
 				"secret_groups":                        []string{}, // passing empty array for secret groups as default value is creating general group and it will cause conflicts as we are using an existing SM