Skip to content

Conversation

nupurg-ibm
Copy link
Collaborator

@nupurg-ibm nupurg-ibm commented Oct 3, 2025

Description

Release required?

  • No release
  • Patch release (x.x.X)
  • Minor release (x.X.x)
  • Major release (X.x.x)
Release notes content

Run the pipeline

If the CI pipeline doesn't run when you create the PR, the PR requires a user with GitHub collaborators access to run the pipeline.

Run the CI pipeline when the PR is ready for review and you expect tests to pass. Add a comment to the PR with the following text:

/run pipeline

Checklist for reviewers

  • If relevant, a test for the change is included or updated with this PR.
  • If relevant, documentation for the change is included or updated with this PR.

For mergers

  • Use a conventional commit message to set the release level. Follow the guidelines.
  • Include information that users need to know about the PR in the commit message. The commit message becomes part of the GitHub release notes.
  • Use the Squash and merge option.

@nupurg-ibm nupurg-ibm self-assigned this Oct 3, 2025
@nupurg-ibm nupurg-ibm requested a review from bksagar as a code owner October 3, 2025 08:56
@nupurg-ibm
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/run pipeline

@nupurg-ibm
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/run pipeline

# LSF tile version locator
LSF_TILE_VERSION="1082e7d2-5e2f-0a11-a3bc-f88a8e1931fc.2ad06fe1-6125-45c5-b8b6-6454eb4907e6-global"
LSF_TILE_VERSION="1082e7d2-5e2f-0a11-a3bc-f88a8e1931fc.92fba4af-b0dd-4b22-9415-9a5465ee9795-global"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@nupurg-ibm Can we bring this as an option for users ?

on the env file ? Assume there is two versions on the tile, 3.0.0 and 3.1.0.. So what ever the user wants they could provide the information.

I have already added a way of how to fetch this version locator on the docs. So users should be able to fetch them. Any thoughts ?

Copy link
Contributor

@bksagar bksagar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved

@nupurg-ibm nupurg-ibm merged commit 069a99b into main Oct 6, 2025
2 checks passed
@nupurg-ibm nupurg-ibm deleted the vl_update branch October 6, 2025 11:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants