Repository navigation
nomenclature: unit vs units
#528
CagtayFabry
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
|
Not sure here but I would stick to the plural form -> |
0 replies
|
a quick search for
So I don't think it is too bad if we want to rename to I guess in these cases we only need a simple if "units" in node:
_units = U_(node["units"])
else:
_units = U_(node["unit"]) |
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Since we implemented our own
quantityschema in #519 we no longer have to follow the asdf schema which would allow us to rename theunitfield of the quantityIn general two options come to mind:
unitoderunitsI think it would be very good to decide on one of these options and use that consistently throughout
weldxMaybe we should look into other fields what is most common. I know that
pint-xarraystores unit information under theunitskey but not sure if that is actually defined in the CF-conventionsAny preferences? please discuss
All reactions