Skip to content

Better linking of prepare-tune-run on mdrun parameters #56

@ljocha

Description

@ljocha

Currently, adding mdrun parameters is sort of clickish ... IMHO the user should be able to provide these in the preparation notebook too.

And besides -nsteps, all the parameters should be applied for the tuning jobs as well, otherwise we tune something else.

Using the tpr file as identifier for a simulation is quite flexible; on the other hand, offering auxiliary tpr's (em, nvt, npt, ...) generated during preparation makes little sense. Reconsider also this design.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions