discuss about partnership

[dominitas]

@DreadKnight

[DreadKnight]

@dominitas Alright, so you were saying about linkedin links.

Feedback regarding the website: I don't see any social media.
Also the animation on the logo makes reading things a bit distracting at first.

[dominitas]

@DreadKnight

this is my linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/domantas-kazlauskas-338a322a5/
and this is the owner of roxonn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/dinesh-rampalli-9b94b0169/
our website: https://app.roxonn.com/
our company linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/company/roxonn/?viewAsMember=true

We have 0.5% fee for users. And 0.5% for those who are creating the tasks. at least for now.

[DreadKnight]

@dominitas Your link is bad, 404 🐻

[dominitas]

@DreadKnight
connect with the owner. My account got suspended for 2-5 days because they thought someone hacked the account even though it was me trying to log in on pc. :(

[DreadKnight]

@dominitas Worked already. I've sent connection invitations to both of you.
I was hoping someone would make something like Roxonn, because I've used everything there was to use before regarding bounties and GitHub and fees where high and coders wanted to do things off the counter to avoid 10% loss and such, meh.

Will look into Roxonn soon. Hoping that listing of GH issues will come soon if it's not implemented already (I've read the FAQ).

[dominitas]

@DreadKnight thank you,
We were thinking of maybe making fees like 5 percent. What would you think? It would be 2.5% for users and 2.5% for bounty creators. Still almost 4 times less than Gitcoin which currently has the lowest fee's

[DreadKnight]

@dominitas Argh, higher fees... Gitcoin does that stuff? Back in the day their website was total chaos, all sorts of things going on, they finally focused and streamlined.

Or you could go for 0 fees, as you have subscriptions and other things going on as alternate income sources 🐻

[dominitas]

@DreadKnight Gitcoin has 8% for users and 10% for clients. We still have 3.5 times lower fees. And thinking of adding a stripe option so we have a variety of exchanges to chose from. And yes there are going to be subscriptions for users and the clients. Because running Ai, node, servers ain't cheap.

[DreadKnight]

@dominitas You know best. Does Gitcoin still have that issue bounty service online?

[dominitas]

@DreadKnight we are open check.

https://app.roxonn.com/repos

Please chose pool manager the first time because you can't change between pool Manager. And contributor.

[DreadKnight]

@dominitas Please reply here, no more issue hijacking 🐻

I've installed this on the repo.

Feedback time! 🕐

A. Found bad Discord link in the starting guide thingy, the "need help?" part gives bad Discord link:
https://discord.com/invite/roxonn (make one that doesn't expire!)
Also, the Discord link from roxonn.com is broken
https://discord.com/invite/4gh7amFM
Note that by default, Discord makes links that expire. Change setting from the dropdown menu to never expire!

B. The logo animation is very off and cheesy ⚠️ not to mention distracting from reading (as I said before)

C. The backgrounds on roxonn.com, while cool, are total 💩 when it comes to accessibility/readability/focus.
You should tone down all that eye candy stuff.

Fix stuff above and I'm willing to proceed:

• need Roxonn support project token XatteR (XTR) on MintMe blockchain -> https://www.mintme.com/token/XatteR/invite
  ( more about the token over here -> https://github.com/FreezingMoon/AncientBeast/wiki/XatteR )
• I'll do a dozen bounties with greatly increased XTR reward
• Will need guarantee that fee stays 5% for at least one year (2.5/2.5 split otherwise it will be cringe to push stuff to coders)
• If tests go well, will add way more bounties on roxonn and announce partnership 💹 🤝 📈
• We can also do symbolic token exchange for sign of good faith XTR <-> ROXN

Let me know how does that sounds to you guys.

[dominitas]

@DreadKnight Hey there! Thanks for the detailed feedback and willingness to work with Roxonn 🤝

Quick Fixes (A, B, C):

You're right on all three - we'll fix the Discord links (permanent invites), tone down/remove the logo animation, and improve background accessibility. Consider these done.

The XTR/MintMe Integration:

Technical Reality:
Adding USDC was easy because it's an ERC20 token on the XDC blockchain we already use - just a few contract calls, ~4-6 hours.

XTR on MintMe is different - it's an entirely separate blockchain. This isn't adding a token, it's adding full support for a second blockchain network (like adding Polygon or Avalanche).

What This Requires:

Custom wallet infrastructure (Tatum SDK doesn't support MintMe)
Smart contract deployment on MintMe network
Dual blockchain architecture for all reward operations
Database schema changes for multi-chain support
Frontend MintMe wallet integration
Complete backend API layer
Ongoing maintenance for two independent chains
Time/Cost:

Proper integration: 51-77 hours (7-10 full workdays with AI assistance)
Semi-centralized approach: 31-49 hours (4-6 days, lower quality)
Cost estimate: $1,550 - $11,550 depending on approach
Plus ongoing maintenance for dual-chain support
Simpler Alternatives:

Option 1: Bridge XTR to XDC Network

If XTR becomes an ERC20 token on XDC via a cross-chain bridge, integration is trivial - just 2-4 hours like USDC was. Everything works with existing infrastructure. Any connections with bridge providers?

Option 2: Start with USDC Bounties

Run your initial dozen bounties using existing tokens. This lets us:
Test the partnership with real activity
Explore bridging XTR to XDC in parallel

Option 3: Co-fund Development

If full MintMe integration is critical:

Ancient Beast helps fund development costs
We prioritize the integration
You get guaranteed support and custom terms
Both projects benefit from expanded blockchain support
Other Points:

Fee Guarantee:

Our current structure is 5% total split (2.5% platform / 2.5% contributor). We can absolutely guarantee this rate stays locked for at least one year for Ancient Beast bounties.

Token Exchange (XTR <-> ROXN):

Love it! We're open to a symbolic token exchange once we've sorted the integration path.

[DreadKnight]

@dominitas Alright, that makes sense. Thanks for the prompt response.

Whilte MintMe is ERC20 Ethereum clone, it's not that popular. We have another token for more serious stuff that's actually supposed to grow in value, unlike XatteR. It's called BEAST, more about it in the wiki -> https://github.com/FreezingMoon/AncientBeast/wiki/BEAST
It's on Polygon network and I've seen that Tatum SDK supports that network for a few years now, as it's pretty nice and popular.

Will have to see what's the status with BEAST token, as it was made part of q/acc accelerator (we've been the first project included), but it got bought and haven't heard from them recently, besides them bugging me to $ellout for weird reasons and FUD like that...
Token was locked initially, unlocking gradually over time, so that there's no rug pull, but using all sorts of addresses and safe wallets for it, tricky. Will check soon and clear things out. BEAST used to be in squidrouter.com (though I'm not sure why it's not showing up along with two thirds of other q/acc tokens), but it still shows up on quickswap at least -> https://dapp.quickswap.exchange/swap/best/ETH/0x4191F84f66e0B7CC10370Ff47a0E2168E35b9Bdf?chainId=137

[dominitas]

@DreadKnight Thanks for the BEAST info - that's definitely more feasible than MintMe since we support Polygon.
The Strategic Challenge:
Here's the issue: If we integrate BEAST for Ancient Beast, every future partner expects custom token integration. We're building a platform to scale to hundreds of projects, and we need clear standards.
Our currency structure:
XDC (native blockchain)
ROXN (platform token)
USDC (universal stablecoin)
These three work globally and keep our platform simple and maintainable.
The Precedent Problem:
If we do custom tokens for one partner, everyone will ask:
Partner B: "Add our Arbitrum token"
Partner C: "Add our BSC token"
Partner D: "Add our Solana token"
We'd spend more time on integrations than building core features. Our focus needs to stay on what makes Roxonn valuable, not becoming a custom integration shop.
What We CAN Offer:
Option 1: Use Standard Tokens ⭐
Fund bounties in USDC (stable, liquid, contributors love it)
5% total fee locked for 1 year for Ancient Beast
Launch immediately, no development delay
Option 2: Dual-Reward System
Official bounties in USDC/XDC/ROXN through Roxonn (automated)
You separately send BEAST bonuses from your wallet (off-platform)
Contributors get stable payment + BEAST tokens
You keep BEAST distribution control, we keep platform simple
Option 3: Start with Token Exchange
Do the symbolic BEAST <-> ROXN exchange you mentioned
Run first batch of bounties on standard tokens
Test the partnership and build trust
Bottom Line:
We want Ancient Beast on Roxonn - you're a quality project. But we need to maintain platform standards to scale effectively. USDC bounties work great for contributors (stable, liquid, universally accepted), and you can always bonus BEAST separately if you want.
Which option works for you? Let's make this happen 🤝