🔀 ALTERNATIVE ALGORITHMS
Priority: LOW - Future Enhancement
Problem
MCTS is expensive for all scenarios. Need simpler alternatives for cost-sensitive or time-constrained situations.
Solution
Implement beam search, greedy, and hybrid algorithm modes for different use cases.
class AlgorithmMode(Enum):
MCTS = "mcts" # Full MCTS (highest quality, highest cost)
BEAM_SEARCH = "beam" # Beam search (medium quality, medium cost)
GREEDY = "greedy" # Greedy selection (lowest cost, fast)
HYBRID = "hybrid" # Adaptive selection based on context
class ConversationAnalyzer:
async def analyze(self, conversation: Conversation, mode: AlgorithmMode = AlgorithmMode.MCTS):
if mode == AlgorithmMode.MCTS:
return await self.mcts_algorithm.run(conversation, config)
elif mode == AlgorithmMode.BEAM_SEARCH:
return await self.beam_search.run(conversation, beam_width=3)
elif mode == AlgorithmMode.GREEDY:
return await self.greedy_selector.run(conversation)
elif mode == AlgorithmMode.HYBRID:
return await self.adaptive_selector.run(conversation)
Algorithm Implementations
class BeamSearchAlgorithm:
async def run(self, conversation: Conversation, beam_width: int = 3) -> AnalysisResult:
"""Beam search for conversation analysis"""
current_beam = [conversation]
for depth in range(self.max_depth):
candidates = []
for conversation_state in current_beam:
# Generate response candidates
responses = await self._generate_candidates(conversation_state, beam_width * 2)
candidates.extend(responses)
# Score and select top beam_width candidates
scored_candidates = await self._score_candidates(candidates)
current_beam = self._select_top_k(scored_candidates, beam_width)
if self._should_stop(current_beam):
break
return self._select_best_response(current_beam)
class GreedySelector:
async def run(self, conversation: Conversation) -> AnalysisResult:
"""Simple greedy response selection"""
# Generate few candidates (2-3)
candidates = await self._generate_candidates(conversation, num_candidates=3)
# Score and select best
scored_candidates = await self._score_candidates(candidates)
return self._select_best(scored_candidates)
class AdaptiveSelector:
async def run(self, conversation: Conversation) -> AnalysisResult:
"""Intelligently choose algorithm based on context"""
context = await self._analyze_context(conversation)
if context.complexity_score > 0.8:
# High complexity -> use MCTS
return await self.mcts_algorithm.run(conversation)
elif context.time_sensitivity > 0.7:
# Time sensitive -> use greedy
return await self.greedy_selector.run(conversation)
else:
# Balanced -> use beam search
return await self.beam_search.run(conversation, beam_width=3)
Implementation Steps
Expected Benefits
- Cost-sensitive options for budget-constrained scenarios
- Fast response modes for time-critical applications
- Adaptive selection based on conversation complexity
Effort: High (1-2 weeks)
🔀 ALTERNATIVE ALGORITHMS
Priority: LOW - Future Enhancement
Problem
MCTS is expensive for all scenarios. Need simpler alternatives for cost-sensitive or time-constrained situations.
Solution
Implement beam search, greedy, and hybrid algorithm modes for different use cases.
Algorithm Implementations
Implementation Steps
Expected Benefits
Effort: High (1-2 weeks)