Skip to content

Feature request: GDS (cuFile) or general RDMA transport for checkpoint/restore #49

Description

@4D0R

Feature request: GDS (cuFile) or general RDMA transport for checkpoint/restore

Right now cuda-checkpoint stages all device memory through host DRAM. On restore that's an extra hop on the read path: bytes have to land in host memory before they can be DMA'd back to the GPU. On checkpoint it stretches out time-to-durability, since the write can't be acknowledged by storage until it's already been copied into host RAM. With a GDS-capable filesystem sitting right there, skipping the bounce would help both sides.

I'd love to know if either of these is on the roadmap:

  1. Native GDS / cuFile integration. A first-class cuFile path for
    checkpoint and restore so the driver can talk to GDS-capable storage
    directly.
  2. A broader RDMA-capable API. Something general enough to back
    RDMA-to-storage or other use cases, not tied to a single transport.

There's already a fair bit of related discussion.

A few questions:

  1. Is GDS / cuFile output planned?
  2. Is RDMA still backlog as of 590, or has the design moved?
  3. Anything structural making either of these particularly difficult?

Given some discussions around fast start ups for vllm, I think that a GDS or RDMA based option would be really interesting here. This could help further reduce inference cold starts, and cold starts for any number of other jobs.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Fields

    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions