Skip to content

Fallback to Ad Hoc Phenotype Creation Given Poor/No Recommendations #52

@jshoughtaling

Description

@jshoughtaling

@rkboyce et al - this is amazing work. We chatted on the phenotype workgroup call a few weeks ago, and I'd be very interested in contributing some work I'll present at OHDSI global this fall on CAPR-based iterative phenotype development using LLMs. I'm not sure if that fits within your vision for the StudyAgent, but after some initial testing with this tool I do see scenarios where it may be advantageous to develop fresh phenotypes on the fly when there are no suitable definitions available in the index/catalog. Please let me know if you'd like to setup a brief call to discuss further.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions