Replies: 2 comments
|
Thanks for asking and being active player @OysteinLq . We in "The Oxalis Management Team" are regularly following and have close watch on global standards, framework and specifications from OpenPeppol, CEF, GIF, OASIS etc. and organizations & network like EESPA and BPC etc Our immediate and main focus is to continuously adhere to latest OpenPeppol specification but that does not mean that these activities/organization/standards are out of our radar. At this moment, I can only say that those topics are part of our regular discussions. |
0 replies
|
Thanks @aaron-kumar , it's good to hear these other networks are at least considered |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hi, as you may know, there's a European trade association called EESPA who are working on what they call the EESPA Interoperability Network (EIN)
EIN seems to be very close to a Peppol as far as the underlying technology goes, using CEF, AS4, SML/SMP, UBL etc. Has anyone considered whether this is something that Oxalis could or should be adapted to support? Or if indeed any adaptation will be required?
For those not familiar, I think a good starting point is on this page: https://eespa.eu/new-interoperability , under the "EESPA Interoperability Network (EIN) under development" banner.
I'm not sure how far off EIN is from being a viable service, so perhaps it's far too early to even consider the question, but I thought I'd ask in case anyone has thoughts on the matter.
All reactions