Follow-up to #109 (labor-request contract landed). The contract now exists with teeth: request → response → evidence → fulfillment → trust, each receipted on the spine, trust bound to guild-scoped GKN standing. This issue tracks the product surface that satisfies it.
Per the SocioProphet Labor Network Charter v0.1 §9 (shell & interaction implications), the shell is organized around market operations, not feed consumption:
- Primary navigation: Requests · Matches · Work · Learn · Trust · Contracts · Governance.
- Primary composer: a request builder / availability-offer builder — not a generic status-update box (LN-007).
- Default home: relevant requests, active matches, work-in-progress, trust events — over generic posts.
- Messaging: contextual + permissioned; unlocks only on mutual interest / shortlist / award / dispute (LN-006).
- Capability passport: evidence, fulfillment history, references, availability, rate floor (LN-008); portable export (LN-019).
- Inspection model: center queue · filters left · evidence inspector right.
Must consume, not reinvent:
Charter phased path: P1 request protocol + capability passport → P2 evidence/fit infra → P3 market coordination → P4 fairness/operating intelligence.
Refs #108, #109, GKN#9. @mdheller
Follow-up to #109 (labor-request contract landed). The contract now exists with teeth:
request → response → evidence → fulfillment → trust, each receipted on the spine, trust bound to guild-scoped GKN standing. This issue tracks the product surface that satisfies it.Per the SocioProphet Labor Network Charter v0.1 §9 (shell & interaction implications), the shell is organized around market operations, not feed consumption:
Must consume, not reinvent:
contracts/labor/*) as the object model,Charter phased path: P1 request protocol + capability passport → P2 evidence/fit infra → P3 market coordination → P4 fairness/operating intelligence.
Refs #108, #109, GKN#9. @mdheller