|
| 1 | +# SonicJS Governance |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +This document describes how decisions are made in the SonicJS project. |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +## Governance Model |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +SonicJS follows a **Benevolent Dictator for Life (BDFL)** model with trusted co-maintainers. The project lead has final authority on project direction, but day-to-day development is a shared responsibility among maintainers. |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +This model is intentionally lightweight. As the project and contributor base grow, we may adopt more formal structures (e.g., a Technical Steering Committee). |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +## Roles |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +### Project Lead (BDFL) |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +- **Current:** [@lane711](https://github.com/lane711) (Lane Campbell) |
| 16 | +- Has final authority on all project decisions |
| 17 | +- Owns the GitHub organization and related infrastructure |
| 18 | +- Sets the project roadmap and long-term vision |
| 19 | +- Can grant or revoke maintainer access |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +### Maintainers |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | +- **Current:** [@lane711](https://github.com/lane711), [@mmcintosh](https://github.com/mmcintosh) |
| 24 | +- Hold the GitHub "Maintain" role on the repository |
| 25 | +- Can review, approve, and merge pull requests |
| 26 | +- Triage issues and respond to community questions |
| 27 | +- Help cut releases and maintain the changelog |
| 28 | +- Expected to follow the decision-making process below |
| 29 | + |
| 30 | +### Contributors |
| 31 | + |
| 32 | +- Anyone who submits a pull request, opens an issue, or participates in discussions |
| 33 | +- See [CONTRIBUTING.md](./CONTRIBUTING.md) for how to get involved |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | +## Decision-Making Process |
| 36 | + |
| 37 | +### What Maintainers Can Merge Independently |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | +Maintainers may merge PRs without explicit sign-off from the project lead when the change is: |
| 40 | + |
| 41 | +- A bug fix aligned with existing behavior |
| 42 | +- A documentation improvement |
| 43 | +- A test addition or improvement |
| 44 | +- A dependency update (patch or minor version) |
| 45 | +- A feature already discussed and approved in an issue or discussion |
| 46 | +- A refactor that does not change public APIs |
| 47 | + |
| 48 | +### What Requires Project Lead Sign-Off |
| 49 | + |
| 50 | +The following changes require explicit approval from the project lead: |
| 51 | + |
| 52 | +- **Breaking changes** to public APIs or plugin interfaces |
| 53 | +- **New major features** not previously discussed |
| 54 | +- **Licensing or governance changes** (this file, LICENSE, CONTRIBUTING.md) |
| 55 | +- **Dependency additions** that introduce significant new surface area |
| 56 | +- **Security-sensitive changes** (auth, permissions, secrets handling) |
| 57 | +- **Release versioning decisions** (especially major version bumps) |
| 58 | +- **Changes to the project's scope or direction** |
| 59 | + |
| 60 | +### Disagreements |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | +If maintainers disagree on a change: |
| 63 | + |
| 64 | +1. Discuss it openly in the PR or a GitHub discussion |
| 65 | +2. If consensus is not reached, the project lead has final say |
| 66 | +3. The project lead may delegate decisions on specific areas to maintainers over time |
| 67 | + |
| 68 | +## Becoming a Maintainer |
| 69 | + |
| 70 | +Maintainers are invited by the project lead after sustained, high-quality contribution to the project. There is no formal application process. |
| 71 | + |
| 72 | +Signals that someone is ready for maintainer status: |
| 73 | + |
| 74 | +- Consistent, meaningful contributions over a period of months |
| 75 | +- High-quality code review on others' PRs |
| 76 | +- Good judgment on what fits the project's direction |
| 77 | +- Responsiveness and helpfulness in issues and discussions |
| 78 | +- Trust established with the existing maintainer team |
| 79 | + |
| 80 | +## Inactivity |
| 81 | + |
| 82 | +Maintainers who are inactive for **6+ months** without prior notice may have their maintainer role moved to "emeritus" status. This is not punitive — it reflects the reality that priorities change. Emeritus maintainers can rejoin active status at any time by resuming meaningful contributions. |
| 83 | + |
| 84 | +## Funding and Financial Matters |
| 85 | + |
| 86 | +SonicJS accepts funding through [GitHub Sponsors](https://github.com/sponsors/lane711) and other channels listed in [.github/FUNDING.yml](./.github/FUNDING.yml). |
| 87 | + |
| 88 | +Financial arrangements between maintainers (e.g., sponsorship revenue sharing, commercial licensing revenue) are handled privately between the parties involved and are not part of this public governance document. |
| 89 | + |
| 90 | +The project lead retains ownership of the GitHub organization and associated trademarks/brand assets. |
| 91 | + |
| 92 | +## Changes to This Document |
| 93 | + |
| 94 | +Changes to this governance document require approval from the project lead and should be discussed openly with the maintainer team before being merged. |
| 95 | + |
| 96 | +## Questions |
| 97 | + |
| 98 | +For questions about governance, open a [GitHub Discussion](https://github.com/lane711/sonicjs/discussions) or reach out to the project lead. |
0 commit comments