Skip to content
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Thanks for the feedback!

The three tables have different unique indices or "keys":

  • asset_commission: asset name + commission_year
  • asset_milestone: asset name + milestone_year
  • asset_both: asset name + commission_year + milestone_year
    (We know asset_both is a bad name... any ideas on what we should rename it?)

We split the data into tables based on these indices to avoid empty or repeated data.

We'll add some descriptions like you suggested, but understanding the tables and how the parameters relate to assets is something we need to explain better. What else do you think would help?
I think a mock network diagram of assets and flows with associated constraints and parameters would help - …

Replies: 1 comment

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by clizbe
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
2 participants