Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
137 lines (98 loc) · 5.09 KB

File metadata and controls

137 lines (98 loc) · 5.09 KB

Evaluate Evydence In 10 Minutes

This walkthrough is for a product-security, AppSec, platform, or customer reviewer who wants to understand the VEX-first release-evidence path without running a full production deployment.

The question to answer is:

This CVE appears in your SBOM. Are you affected, why, who approved it, and what can I verify?

Evydence answers that question by linking release, artifact, SBOM, vulnerability scan, VEX or manual decision, approval or exception, readiness, bundle, package, and audit-chain evidence. The checked fixtures are non-sensitive examples. They are not legal compliance proof, certification, complete SBOM proof, authoritative vulnerability results, or a secure-release guarantee.

1. Verify The Public Release Candidate

Start by verifying the release artifacts you would install or evaluate:

make public-release-verify TAG=v0.1.0-rc.7

This downloads the public release-candidate evidence and checks the release archives, OpenAPI checksum, migration checksum, in-toto provenance statement shape, and signed release manifest. The release evidence index explains every artifact in the set:

2. Open The Sample Customer Package

Open the local package viewer:

xdg-open site/package-viewer/index.html

If xdg-open is not available, open site/package-viewer/index.html directly from your browser.

In the viewer, press Load bundled demo or load this checked fixture:

examples/end-to-end-release-evidence/sample-customer-package-manifest.json

The sample package is also available as a ZIP archive:

examples/end-to-end-release-evidence/sample-customer-package.zip

Use the viewer to inspect:

  • release scope, package scope, and limitations;
  • included artifact, SBOM, scan, VEX, decision, approval, and bundle metadata;
  • the vulnerability decision that explains why the sample finding is not treated as an unresolved blocker;
  • verification status and audit-chain evidence;
  • explicitly excluded raw payload bytes, secrets, hashes, and internal notes.

The package viewer guide has the same path with screenshots and offline verification commands:

3. Verify The Sample Package

Verify the checked package fixture without running the API:

go run ./cmd/evydence package verify \
  --archive examples/end-to-end-release-evidence/sample-customer-package.zip \
  --expected-package-id csp_example \
  --expected-product-id prod_example \
  --expected-release-id rel_example

Expected result: the command exits successfully and validates the package manifest, archive metadata, and expected scope identifiers. It verifies the example package bytes; it does not verify facts outside the sample data.

4. Read The Evidence Path

Use the end-to-end example as the shortest map from the reviewer question to concrete API outputs:

The key files are:

Reviewer question Example file
Which SBOM did you use? sample-customer-package-manifest.json and sample-readiness-report.json
Which scanner raised the finding? sample-security-summary.json
Are you affected and why? sample-customer-package-manifest.json vulnerability decision section
Who recorded or approved the answer? package approvals and audit-chain fixture
What can I verify offline? package archive, package manifest, bundle metadata, and audit-chain fixture
What is missing or limited? readiness report gaps, assumptions, limitations, and non-claims

5. Run The Local API Demo When Ready

After the static review path makes sense, run the API-backed demo:

EVYDENCE_URL=http://localhost:8080 \
EVYDENCE_API_KEY='evy_replace_with_scoped_secret' \
examples/end-to-end-release-evidence/run-local-demo.sh

The demo creates a product, release, artifact, SBOM, vulnerability scan, vulnerability decision, release bundle, redaction profile, customer package, readiness report, security summary, and audit-chain verification output under tmp/end-to-end-release-evidence/.

For a step-by-step local API setup, use:

What This Evaluation Should Show

After these steps, a reviewer should be able to trace one vulnerability answer from SBOM and scanner evidence through a VEX or manual decision into a customer-safe package and verification commands.

This supports compliance readiness and technical evidence organization. It does not replace human review, legal analysis, scanner validation, provider controls, or customer-specific disclosure decisions.