Is your feature request related to a problem?
A blind ham operator reached out noting that very few ham radio applications are accessible to blind users — and asked whether OHC has been audited for screen-reader compatibility. The honest answer is: not systematically.
This isn't a single bug. It's a tracking/umbrella issue for a structured accessibility pass across the whole app, with the explicit goal of making sure blind and low-vision hams get a usable, dignified experience — not just a stripped-down "lite" version.
Describe the Solution You'd Like
A structured audit and follow-up improvements covering, at minimum:
Screen reader support
- Verify every interactive element has an accessible name (
aria-label, associated <label>, or visible text)
- Add
aria-live regions for status changes — band changes, new spots, WSJT-X decodes, satellite pass alerts, lightning proximity alerts, etc. — so screen-reader users get notified of important events without polling the UI
- Ensure landmark roles (
<nav>, <main>, <aside>, etc.) are correct
- Verify every panel is reachable and operable via keyboard alone
Keyboard navigation
- All controls reachable via Tab in a logical order
- All interactive elements operable via Enter / Space
- Visible focus indicators that are not removed by
outline: none
- Standard shortcuts considered (e.g.
/ to focus a search, ? for help)
Visual / non-screen-reader accessibility
- Color contrast meets WCAG AA in all themes (Dark, Light, Retro, custom)
- Information not conveyed by color alone — band-color heatmaps, propagation maps, status indicators all need text/icon alternatives
- Charts and data visualizations have textual summaries available to screen readers
Data tables / spot lists
- Use semantic table markup where appropriate so screen readers can navigate by column / row
- Frequency and time announced in human-readable forms (e.g. "fourteen point zero seven four megahertz, three minutes ago")
Map
- A non-map view of the same data for screen-reader users (e.g. a list of spots with bearing + distance from DE)? Or at least an
aria-described summary of what's currently on the map?
Describe Alternatives You've Considered
- Linking to a separate screen-reader-friendly site would let other dashboards remain "the accessible one" while OHC stayed "the rich/visual one". Not preferred — we want OHC to be the inclusive option, not delegate.
Use Case
Every ham deserves access to propagation data, contest info, satellite passes, and POTA/SOTA spots — regardless of vision. Blind ops are a small but vibrant part of the community, and the "ham radio software is hostile to screen readers" complaint comes up regularly enough that addressing it well would be a real differentiator.
Would you be willing to help implement this?
Call for testers
If any blind or low-vision operators in the community would be willing to test and give feedback during the audit, please comment here. That direct lived-experience feedback is hugely more valuable than running automated WCAG checkers in isolation — automated tools catch the easy stuff but miss the friction that only a real screen-reader user can describe.
Additional Context
Filed in response to feedback from a blind operator. Expect this umbrella issue to spawn smaller sub-issues for individual panels or interaction patterns as the audit progresses. Tagging help wanted because community testing input is essential to doing this well.
Is your feature request related to a problem?
A blind ham operator reached out noting that very few ham radio applications are accessible to blind users — and asked whether OHC has been audited for screen-reader compatibility. The honest answer is: not systematically.
This isn't a single bug. It's a tracking/umbrella issue for a structured accessibility pass across the whole app, with the explicit goal of making sure blind and low-vision hams get a usable, dignified experience — not just a stripped-down "lite" version.
Describe the Solution You'd Like
A structured audit and follow-up improvements covering, at minimum:
Screen reader support
aria-label, associated<label>, or visible text)aria-liveregions for status changes — band changes, new spots, WSJT-X decodes, satellite pass alerts, lightning proximity alerts, etc. — so screen-reader users get notified of important events without polling the UI<nav>,<main>,<aside>, etc.) are correctKeyboard navigation
outline: none/to focus a search,?for help)Visual / non-screen-reader accessibility
Data tables / spot lists
Map
aria-describedsummary of what's currently on the map?Describe Alternatives You've Considered
Use Case
Every ham deserves access to propagation data, contest info, satellite passes, and POTA/SOTA spots — regardless of vision. Blind ops are a small but vibrant part of the community, and the "ham radio software is hostile to screen readers" complaint comes up regularly enough that addressing it well would be a real differentiator.
Would you be willing to help implement this?
Call for testers
If any blind or low-vision operators in the community would be willing to test and give feedback during the audit, please comment here. That direct lived-experience feedback is hugely more valuable than running automated WCAG checkers in isolation — automated tools catch the easy stuff but miss the friction that only a real screen-reader user can describe.
Additional Context
Filed in response to feedback from a blind operator. Expect this umbrella issue to spawn smaller sub-issues for individual panels or interaction patterns as the audit progresses. Tagging
help wantedbecause community testing input is essential to doing this well.