Issues with use of treebank data

[balmas]

using this as a way to keep track of a list of issues with use of the treebank data to disambiguate for games:

• lemmas cannot always be matched with parser output. E.g. fastus in the first line of Propertius. Treebank data says fastus3 but there is no way to tell purely from the treebank data which of the Whitaker fastus lemmas this is

• when lemmas identified by the treebank don't match any lemma provided by the parser, as is currently the case with many proper names, we can't provide full inflection data (e.g. declension is missing)

[monzug]

in case of fastus, we have two lemmas highlighted: a noun of 2nd decl and a noun of 4th decl.
the game is correctly set with the noun of 4th decl.