First question at https://berty.tech/faq . That some boxes are empty seems ok as long as anyone can complete the table via a PR (even if some boxes are obvious like the purchase/runtime fee from Telegram or the privacy respecting terms of Weechat).
But for reasons of credibility, we must at least ensure that there is no obvious misinformation. For the same reasons we should correct typos / wrong naming and add sources that confound the veracity of a checkbox.
Global:
end-to-end encryption -> End-to-End EncryptionSkuttlebut -> ScuttlebuttSkred -> Skred (Twinme) or Twinme (Skred)Facebook -> Facebook Messenger (or at least Facebook M. if there are size constraints)- Anonymous use possible -> What does that mean? Shouldn't we decline into
Email required, Credit card required, etc...?
- We should have a tooltip that displays a description and links on each feature / checkbox.
Signal:
- No purchase fee == Partially -> ?
- No phone number required == True -> I don't think so.
Threema:
- Open Spec == False -> They have a whitepaper so it should at least be
Partially.
Olvid: (changes reverted by error, adding them to the checklist as a reminder)
- No phone number required == False -> Wrong it's true.
Matrix:
First question at https://berty.tech/faq . That some boxes are empty seems ok as long as anyone can complete the table via a PR (even if some boxes are obvious like the purchase/runtime fee from Telegram or the privacy respecting terms of Weechat).
But for reasons of credibility, we must at least ensure that there is no obvious misinformation. For the same reasons we should correct typos / wrong naming and add sources that confound the veracity of a checkbox.
Global:
end-to-end encryption->End-to-End EncryptionSkuttlebut->ScuttlebuttSkred->Skred (Twinme)orTwinme (Skred)Facebook->Facebook Messenger(or at leastFacebook M.if there are size constraints)Email required,Credit card required, etc...?Signal:
Threema:
Partially.Olvid: (changes reverted by error, adding them to the checklist as a reminder)
Matrix: