BSIP-0043 further improvements: share taker market fees to maker's registrar and referrer

[bitphage]

Current implementation always rewards buyer of the asset (referrer and registrar) no matter was he is_maker: True or False. Instead, it would be more reasonable to always reward Maker.

Example (current): maker keeps sell order of 1000 CNY (order stays on books). When order fills, reward will go to buyer.
Proposed change: when order fills, the reward goes to Maker.

[abitmore]

The logic about market fee sharing is: the one who bought an amount of asset pays the market fee, her registrar and referrer would get a part of the fee. It's fair to reward the parties because they brought the trader who paid the fees. The logic was clear.

I don't think it's good to mix maker-taker incentives with market fee sharing incentives. For incentives about market makers, I think it's better to discuss in the scope of #130 (or the PR #133).

[pmconrad]

the one who bought an amount of asset pays the market fee

Clarification: in every trade there are two buyers, and both pay a market fee on the asset they buy (provided that the asset has a market fee set).

[pmconrad]

Agree that maker/taker fees are already discussed elsewhere. Closing this as a duplicate.