-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
Closed
Labels
enhancementNew feature or requestNew feature or request
Description
@aseyboldt Thanks for the idea to reuse existing fields in segment files for damping/regularization. To start with, the potential fields are:
ss_rate: relevant to all faultsss_rate_sig: relevant to all faultsss_rate_flag: relevant to all faultsds_rate: relevant to non-vertical faultsds_rate_sig: relevant to non-vertical faultsds_rate_flag: relevant to non-vertical faultsts_rate: relevant to vertical faultsts_rate_sig: relevant to vertical faultsts_rate_flag: relevant to vertical faults
Proposal 1:
If a fault slip component is to be included in the damping set, *s_rate_flag = 2. Why 2? 1 still has a meaning for old-school soft constraints.
Thoughts? Alternatives?
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
enhancementNew feature or requestNew feature or request