Skip to content

Proposal for damping flags #286

@brendanjmeade

Description

@brendanjmeade

@aseyboldt Thanks for the idea to reuse existing fields in segment files for damping/regularization. To start with, the potential fields are:

  • ss_rate: relevant to all faults
  • ss_rate_sig: relevant to all faults
  • ss_rate_flag: relevant to all faults
  • ds_rate: relevant to non-vertical faults
  • ds_rate_sig: relevant to non-vertical faults
  • ds_rate_flag: relevant to non-vertical faults
  • ts_rate: relevant to vertical faults
  • ts_rate_sig: relevant to vertical faults
  • ts_rate_flag: relevant to vertical faults

Proposal 1:

If a fault slip component is to be included in the damping set, *s_rate_flag = 2. Why 2? 1 still has a meaning for old-school soft constraints.

Thoughts? Alternatives?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

enhancementNew feature or request

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions