|
| 1 | +--- |
| 2 | +CIP: XXXX |
| 3 | +Title: Default SPO vote |
| 4 | +Category: Ledger |
| 5 | +Authors: |
| 6 | + - Teodora Danciu <[email protected]> |
| 7 | + - Alexey Kuleshevich <[email protected]> |
| 8 | +Implementors: N/A |
| 9 | +Status: Proposed |
| 10 | +Discussions: |
| 11 | + - https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/pull/1108 |
| 12 | + - https://github.com/IntersectMBO/cardano-ledger/issues/4645 |
| 13 | +Created: 2025-10-28 |
| 14 | +License: CC-BY-4.0 |
| 15 | +--- |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +## Abstract |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | +We propose introducing an explicit mechanism for SPOs to define their default governance vote as part of their pool's registration parameters. |
| 20 | +This would replace the current indirect approach, which relies on delegating the pool’s reward account to predefined DReps AlwaysNoConfidence and AlwaysAbstain. |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +## Motivation: why is this CIP necessary? |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +The current approach was always intended as a temporary workaround. While it solved the immediate problem (as discussed in [cardano-ledger#4645](https://github.com/IntersectMBO/cardano-ledger/issues/4645)), it introduces several issues: |
| 25 | + * It is not transparent or easily inspectable what a pool’s default vote actually is, making it difficult to understand how undelegated or non-voting stake will behave in governance actions. |
| 26 | + * It couples operational reward accounts with governance semantics, constraining how SPOs can use their reward accounts. |
| 27 | + * It can distort governance outcomes, as SPOs who do not configure their reward accounts may unintentionally default to voting No, potentially skewing proposal results. |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +By contrast, providing SPOs with a clear, explicit default vote parameter allows them to opt in or out of governance participation transparently, mitigating the coupling between financial and governance mechanisms and reducing long-term bias in voting behaviour. |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +## Specification |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +### Current behaviour |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | +The "default vote" determines how *not voting* counts toward the ratification of a proposal. |
| 36 | +For SPOs, this is currently implemented as folllows: |
| 37 | + * `HardForkInitiation` proposals: default is `No` |
| 38 | + * `NoConfidence` proposals: |
| 39 | + - if the pool's reward account is delegated to `AlwaysNoConfidence`, the default is `Yes` |
| 40 | + - otherwise, `No` |
| 41 | + * `UpdateCommittee` and `ParameterUpdate` (for security-group parameters) proposals: |
| 42 | + - if the pool reward account is delegated to `AlwaysAbstain`, the default is `Abstain` |
| 43 | + - otherwise, `No` |
| 44 | + |
| 45 | +### Proposed changes |
| 46 | + |
| 47 | +Add a new non-optional field to the pool parameters that specifies the SPO's default vote, with 3 possible values: |
| 48 | + * `DefaultNoConfidence`: `Yes` on `NoConfidence`, `No` on all other actions (matches delegation to `AlwaysNoConfidence`) |
| 49 | + * `DefaultAbstain`: `Abstain` on all actions (matches delegation to `AlwaysAbstain`) |
| 50 | + * `NoDefault`: `No` on all actions (matches no delegation to a default DRep) |
| 51 | + |
| 52 | +<br> |
| 53 | + |
| 54 | +Currently the pool parameters are specified in cddl like this: |
| 55 | + |
| 56 | +```cddl |
| 57 | +pool_params = |
| 58 | + ( operator : pool_keyhash |
| 59 | + , vrf_keyhash : vrf_keyhash |
| 60 | + , pledge : coin |
| 61 | + , cost : coin |
| 62 | + , margin : unit_interval |
| 63 | + , reward_account : reward_account |
| 64 | + , pool_owners : set<addr_keyhash> |
| 65 | + , relays : [* relay] |
| 66 | + , pool_metadata : pool_metadata/ nil |
| 67 | + ) |
| 68 | +``` |
| 69 | + |
| 70 | +The proposed definition is: |
| 71 | +```cddl |
| 72 | +pool_params = |
| 73 | + ( operator : pool_keyhash |
| 74 | + , vrf_keyhash : vrf_keyhash |
| 75 | + , pledge : coin |
| 76 | + , cost : coin |
| 77 | + , margin : unit_interval |
| 78 | + , reward_account : reward_account |
| 79 | + , pool_owners : set<addr_keyhash> |
| 80 | + , relays : [* relay] |
| 81 | + , pool_metadata : pool_metadata/ nil |
| 82 | + , default_vote : stakepool_default_vote |
| 83 | + ) |
| 84 | +
|
| 85 | +stakepool_default_vote = default_vote_abstain / default_vote_no_confidence / no_default_vote |
| 86 | +default_vote_abstain = 0 |
| 87 | +default_vote_no_confidence = 1 |
| 88 | +no_default_vote = 2 |
| 89 | +``` |
| 90 | + |
| 91 | +This change requires a hard fork, since it modifies transaction serialization. |
| 92 | + |
| 93 | +### Migration of currently configured default votes |
| 94 | + |
| 95 | +At the hard-fork boundary, the pool parameters of each existing pool will be updated to reflect the implicit preference currently expressed through its reward account delegation. |
| 96 | +For each pool, we'll set the new `defaultVote` parameter to: |
| 97 | + * `DefaultAbstain`, if the reward account is delegated to `AlwaysAbstain` |
| 98 | + * `DefaultNoConfidence`, if the reward account is delegated to `AlwaysNoConfidence` |
| 99 | + * `NoDefault`, if the reward account is not delegated to a defaul DRep |
| 100 | + |
| 101 | +## Path to Active |
| 102 | + |
| 103 | +### Acceptance Criteria |
| 104 | + |
| 105 | +- [ ] Transaction serializers and deserializers in [cardano-ledger](https://github.com/IntersectMBO/cardano-ledger) are implemented such that they follow the cddl specification described above, and reflected in the cddl specs |
| 106 | +- [ ] The migration of the existing default vote preferences is implemented in ledger |
| 107 | +- [ ] The feature is integrated into [cardano-node](https://github.com/IntersectMBO/cardano-node) with necessary adjustments made to [ouroboros-consensus](https://github.com/IntersectMBO/ouroboros-consensus) and released as part of the Dijkstra era hard fork |
| 108 | + |
| 109 | +### Implementation Plan |
| 110 | + |
| 111 | +- [ ] Add support for a new pool parameter without changing serialization in existing eras |
| 112 | +- [ ] Implement and test migration logic to populate the new parameter at the hard-fork boundary. |
| 113 | + |
| 114 | +## Copyright |
| 115 | + |
| 116 | +This CIP is licensed under [CC-BY-4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode). |
0 commit comments