Given this snippet: ```` TRY; ... an operation that may fail ... CATCH; END; ```` When the operation fails, the error is not caught. Aparently an empty CATCH block is treated the same as no CATCH block. Bug or documentation issue?
Given this snippet:
When the operation fails, the error is not caught.
Aparently an empty CATCH block is treated the same as no CATCH block.
Bug or documentation issue?