Flatpak - Flathub store states that Xiphos is not verified

[robertospenha]

Hi, hey. I am a user in linux and I decided to search a software for offline study of the Bible and I accepted the proposal of Xiphos very good. Priority in my installations software in Flatpak format

The Flathub store states that Xiphos is not verified. I was in doubt if it is something that the Xiphos team missed in a de-appetized way or if this initiative is separate from the main project itself. Have you ever tried to get the check stamp on the flathub?

I believe that with this it would bring greater credibility / visibility to the software within the flatpak environment.

I hope you will consider this as a way to make the software even more accessible to the Bible-lover community on Linux.

[LAfricain]

The Flathub is pointless since we only release new versions very rarely. However, as soon as a new version is available, I update the PPA for Ubuntu. I don't know about Fedora. In any case, since the official repositories already offer Xiphos, why create extra work by offering a Flatpak?

[robertospenha]

I am not an expert in programming. but so I analyzed about the best software formats for installation taking into account flexibility and security I found the flatpak better
I already use ubuntu. However, if you are in flatpak Fedora users would already have more easy access, for example.
Flatpak has the advantage of running insulated from the rest of the system, which as far as I research makes it impossible for some library to rely on other software harms the operation of Xiphos.
In addition, flathub has probably become the leading app store in linux. And other stores support flatpaks like Gnome Softwares. It is easier to use it than the terminal. Although for my case that would be no problem.
However, I respect the project team’s choices. In this way I already imagine that the flatpak version in flathub is a separate initiative from you. Perhaps these people from the flathub repository can assist in the official flatpak version and minimize these additional works.
However, as a potential user, I made my recommendations.