Explicit Compile-Time Execution Design #311
tahadostifam
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Explicit Compile-Time Execution Design
Executive Summary
Cyrus introduces a clean separation between compile-time and runtime execution through explicit
comptimefunctions, providing predictable metaprogramming capabilities while maintaining simplicity and clarity.1. Core Philosophy
Principle of Explicit Separation
Design Goals
2. Language Design
2.1 Function Classification
2.2 Key Characteristics
3. Type System Integration
3.1 First-Class Types
3.2 Generic Types vs. Generated Types
4. Use Cases and Examples
4.1 JSON Schema → Type Generation
5. Implementation Architecture
5.1 Compilation Pipeline
5.2 Memory Model
6. Advantages Over Implicit Models (like Zig)
6.1 Clear Separation of Concerns
6.2 Predictable Performance
6.3 Safety Guarantees
7. Limitations and Trade-offs
7.1 Code Duplication
7.2 Learning Curve
7.3 Tooling Complexity
8. Conclusion
Cyrus's explicit compile-time execution model offers:
This design is particularly well-suited for:
Appendix: Comparison with Other Languages
constexprconst fn(hybrid approach)Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions