Difference between Spacemacs and Doom Emacs while using org-gtd

[Trid-collab]

I confirm that...

• I searched the FAQ, issue tracker, discussions board, documentation, and wiki, and did not find an answer to my question.

• Any discussions with or conclusions derived from the use of LLMs will be omitted from my question.

What is your question?

I am new to Emacs. Wanted to learn org and in the process got drawn org-gtd and hence trying to get introduced through Doom or Spacemacs..Presently I have installed org-gtd in both Spacemacs and Doom, but I noticed a difference while using them in the first process org-gtd-capture. I have the Spacemacs seem to have one extra option compared to the Doom emacs. refer to the screenshots. It seems that the "C" option is missing in Doom Emacs. It had rasied with org-gtd forum, I was referred back to here. Why is that. Is there some package I am missing

System information

No response

[hlissner]

Doom removes the C entry to encourage users to configure Emacs with elisp from its dotfiles (example), because Emacs' Customize interface is problematic in ways most packages (and starter kits) don't anticipate.

But if you really can't do without Customize, undo the advice with:

;;; add to $DOOMDIR/config.el
(with-eval-after-load 'org
  (advice-remove #'org-mks #'+org--remove-customize-option-a))

Just remember this if/when you run into issues.

[panchoh]

(small typo on the FAQ entry about customize: s/can be compete/can compete/. Reporting here for minimal fuzz, no ack needed, unless for scolding :-P)

[panchoh]

Hi, @Trid-collab!

Best of luck in your endeavor of learning Emacs and Org. I followed a similar path starting with Spacemacs, and then moving to Doom.

If you are satisfied with Henrik’s reply, please mark this discussion as answered, and close the discussion, so that other unanswered questions can get more attention from would-be helpers.

Thanks a bunch!