Replies: 1 comment
-
|
I think it would be wise to insist on an explicit statement of availability, which should normally include a . Of course the explicit statement might just say "We (Dracor) believe this material to be in the public domain, but the corpus providers have not explicitly stated this. Use at your own risk. " |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Looking at issue #10 I noticed that many corpora (for instance ClaDraCor, HunDraCor, ItaDraCor, UDraCor) do not add availability information to their source references. Is that ok or should we add a schematron warning telling encoders that availability information should be added?
If so, what would be the rules for providing this information? Is
<availability><p>In the public domain.</p></availability>ok, or should there be always be a reference to a licence?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions