Skip to content

AUDIT_TODO.md

Latest commit

 

History

History
98 lines (69 loc) · 3.41 KB

AUDIT_TODO.md

File metadata and controls

98 lines (69 loc) · 3.41 KB
Raw

JARVIS Project - Critical Audit Required

Created: 2026-01-18 Status: NEEDS HEAVY AUDIT AND FIXES

Overview

The CLAUDE.md configuration file has several concerning patterns that need thorough review and remediation.

Issues Identified

1. Security Concerns

  • Hardcoded paths to sensitive files - Position state, exit intents, and Grok state files are exposed
  • API tokens referenced in environment variables - Need to verify these aren't logged or exposed
  • OAuth tokens mentioned (JARVIS_ACCESS_TOKEN) - Audit token handling and rotation
  • Kill switches - Verify LIFEOS_KILL_SWITCH and X_BOT_ENABLED actually work and can't be bypassed

2. Risk Management

  • Max positions at 50 - Is this appropriate? What's the risk exposure?
  • $10 daily Grok cost limit - Seems arbitrary, needs cost analysis
  • Circuit breaker settings (60s min interval, 30min cooldown) - Are these tested?
  • No apparent rate limiting documentation for trading operations
  • "TREASURY_LIVE_MODE" - What safeguards exist between dry run and live?

3. Code Quality

  • No error handling examples shown in the code snippets
  • No logging/monitoring mentioned - How are failures detected?
  • No backup/recovery procedures documented
  • No testing strategy mentioned

4. Architecture Concerns

  • Supervisor pattern - Single point of failure? What happens if supervisor.py crashes?
  • Multiple bots sharing state - Race conditions? Locking mechanisms?
  • External API dependencies (Jupiter DEX, Grok AI, Twitter) - Fallback strategies?

5. Documentation Gaps

  • "Recent Fixes" section dated 2026-01-15 - Only 3 days of history tracked
  • No versioning strategy mentioned
  • No deployment procedures documented
  • No rollback procedures documented

6. Operational Risks

  • Autonomous posting engine - What prevents runaway posting?
  • CLI commands via X mentions - Admin execution via public Twitter? Security review needed
  • Telegram "full admin interface" - What authentication exists?

Recommended Audit Steps

Phase 1: Security Audit

  1. Review all token/secret handling
  2. Audit authentication mechanisms for Telegram admin
  3. Review X mention CLI command execution security
  4. Check for exposed secrets in logs

Phase 2: Risk Management Review

  1. Document all trading limits and their rationale
  2. Test kill switches under various failure modes
  3. Review circuit breaker effectiveness
  4. Stress test position limits

Phase 3: Code Review

  1. Add comprehensive error handling
  2. Implement proper logging throughout
  3. Add unit and integration tests
  4. Review race conditions in shared state

Phase 4: Operations

  1. Document deployment procedures
  2. Create runbooks for common failures
  3. Set up monitoring and alerting
  4. Create backup/recovery procedures

Priority Items (Do First)

  1. CRITICAL: Audit X mention CLI execution - public attack vector
  2. CRITICAL: Review Telegram admin authentication
  3. HIGH: Test all kill switches actually work
  4. HIGH: Review trading safeguards between dry-run and live mode
  5. MEDIUM: Add comprehensive logging
  6. MEDIUM: Document recovery procedures

Notes

This file should be updated as issues are identified and resolved. Each checkbox should be checked off only after thorough review and testing.