Resp in <rdg> not visualized

[FLazzerini]

Some readings are attributed to manuscripts and editions (using wit), but some are conjectures of scholars whom we encoded differently from other editors (for philological / methodological reasons: these scholars do not have a corresponding text to be visualized in the software).
An example from Lucullus:

<app from="#Luc-008-50" to="#Luc-008-51">
                  <lem
                     wit="#Bes #Chis_A #Harl3 #Laur1 #Linc #Pal6 #Ricc #Vat4 #Vat6 #Ven #ed.Rom #Pen. #Bev. #Min. #Asc.1 #Ald. #Asc.2 #Asc.3 #Crat. #Asc.4 #Herw. #Vict. #Sturm #Man. #Tal. #Lamb. #Grut. #Ern. #Halm #Bait."/>
                  <rdg type="sub-archetypal" cause="addition"
                     wit="#B #V #S #F #ν #ε #ζ #γ #Erl #Laur2 #Reg #Urb #Ven4 #Goer.">et quibus et
                     quasi</rdg>
                  <rdg type="lectio.sing" cause="intentional" wit="#A">et quibus <gap
                        reason="cancelled" rend="scratched"/> quasi</rdg>
                  <rdg type="sub-archetypal" cause="intentional"
                     wit="#B.c #Ambr1 #Chis1 #ed.Ven #Baz.">et quibus <del rend="underlined"
                        hand="#B.hand.c">et</del> quasi </rdg>
                  <rdg type="editorial" wit="#A.3">et quibus hec quasi</rdg>
                  <rdgGrp type="editorial">
                     <rdg wit="#μ #Reid" resp="#Rein.">a quibusdam et quasi</rdg>
                     <rdg resp="#Schütz">ab aliquibus et quasi</rdg>
                  </rdgGrp>
               </app>

(at the very end, in the rdgGrp type="editorial")
The reading a quibusdam et quasi is attributed to 2 wits (μ and Reid) and a scholar, via resp (Rein.). Similarly, the reading ab aliquibus et quasi is a conjecture attributed to resp Schütz.
Currently the system does not show the attribute resp and its value:

It should appear next to the values of wit. In fact, I would suggest that (@matteodifranco do you agree?) it doesn't even have to be visually distinguished from the values of wit: it matters little to the user whether the author of that conjecture was encoded by us as an editor or a scholar. The only difference would be that, if the user clicked on the name of the scholar, they would not be led to the text of their edition (which does not exist) but to the index of people, where information about the scholar is given.

But the value of resp must be visualized, otherwise the reading is incomplete.

[matteodifranco]

I do agree, I have used resp in the same way and encounter the same issue

[RenatoCaenaro]

fixed in:
SilentWave#18
try it on:
https://evt3-depa.silentwave.eu/

@RobertoRDT click on resp will open named entities modal with the person selected if resp value is an xml:id, is that ok?

[RobertoRDT]

RobertoRDT click on resp will open named entities modal with the person selected if resp value is an xml:id, is that ok?

Depends on where the xml:id is located:

• if it belongs to a <person> element that's ok, it's a proper named entity
• but it could belong to a <name> element in a <respStmt>, in the which case EVT won't find the expected sub-elements of a named entity

[FLazzerini]

Now the person encoded as resp appears after the tag resp, but that's confusing for the user, who doesn't know what "resp" is about.
As I mentioned above, I think the person encoded as resp should appear next to the witnesses with no graphic changes. No problem if clicking on them leads the user to the named entities: that's fine. But just by looking at the apparatus we should avoid this difference, which is confusing.