Skip to content

Commit 3069f5a

Browse files
relotnekKen Toler
relotnek
and
Ken Toler
authored
Introducing Decentralized IR Framework (security-alliance#165)
* added DeIRF framework * new de-irf framework * adjusted summary as requested --------- Co-authored-by: Ken Toler <ken.toler@gmail.com>
1 parent 45021be commit 3069f5a

4 files changed

Lines changed: 203 additions & 0 deletions

File tree

‎src/config/SUMMARY.md.develop‎

Lines changed: 1 addition & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -79,6 +79,7 @@
7979
- [Lessons Learned](./incident-management/lessons-learned.md)
8080
- [Playbooks](./incident-management/playbooks.md)
8181
- [SEAL 911 War Room Guidelines](./incident-management/seal-911-war-room-guidelines.md)
82+
- [Decentralized Incident Response Framework (DeIRF)](./incident-management/decentralized-ir.md)
8283
- [Threat Modeling](./threat-modeling/README.md)
8384
- [Create and Maintain Threat Models](./threat-modeling/create-maintain-threat-models.md)
8485
- [Identity Mitigate Threats](./threat-modeling/identity-mitigate-threats.md)

‎src/incident-management/decentralized-ir.md‎

Lines changed: 140 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
1+
---
2+
tags:
3+
- Security Specialist
4+
- Operations & Strategy
5+
- Devops
6+
- SRE
7+
contributors:
8+
- role: wrote
9+
users: [relotnek]
10+
---
11+
12+
# Decentralized Incident Response Framework (DeIRF)
13+
14+
A lightweight, end-to-end scaffold for security teams that work without a single authority.
15+
Use it as a menu, not a mandate.
16+
17+
18+
# 1. Guiding Principles
19+
20+
| Principle | What it means in practice |
21+
|-----------|---------------------------|
22+
| **Zero-trust by default** | Assume every identity, device, and network path is potentially hostile. |
23+
| **Shared responsibility** | Any responder can start an action if quorum rules are met. |
24+
| **Minimum viable process** | Fewer steps, fewer blockers, faster containment. |
25+
| **Open tooling** | Prefer transparent, auditable, community-maintained tools. |
26+
| **Identity plurality** | Accept multiple forms of strong identity proof. |
27+
| **Evidence first** | Collect before you change anything. |
28+
| **Continuous learning** | Retrospective after every incident and drill. |
29+
30+
---
31+
32+
# 2. Roles and Identities
33+
34+
| Role | Key duties | Identity options (at least two) |
35+
|------|-----------|----------------------------------|
36+
| **First Reporter** | Sounds the alarm and starts evidence capture. | GPG key, DID, or multisig wallet signature |
37+
| **Triage Lead** | Confirms severity, forms a swarm, assigns tasks. | FIDO2 passkey, GPG, signed Matrix handle |
38+
| **Comms Lead** | Handles community and regulator updates. | Company issued OIDC, Lens profile |
39+
| **Containment Lead** | Executes on chain actions or host isolation. | Multisig signer, SSH CA cert |
40+
| **Recorder** | Maintains the timeline in an immutable log. | GPG key, signed git commit |
41+
42+
> **Tip**: Publish a public mapping of handles to real names and keep it in a tamper evident repo.
43+
44+
---
45+
46+
# 3. Preparation Checklist
47+
48+
| Item | Why it matters | Suggested tools |
49+
|------|----------------|-----------------|
50+
| Asset inventory (code, infra, keys) | You cannot protect what you do not know. | ConfigDB + IaC scans, Sheet/CSV |
51+
| Log pipeline with reliable clock | Forensic accuracy and ordering. | Vector + Loki or OpenSearch, Elasticsearch, RunReveal |
52+
| Secure comms channels | Quick swarm with strong auth. | Matrix + E2EE, Signal groups, Wire |
53+
| Evidence bucket (write-once) | Keeps raw data safe. | S3 object-lock, Storj, or IPFS |
54+
| Automated alert rules | Detect known bad patterns. | On chain monitors, Falco, OpenZeppelin Defender, Slackbot |
55+
| Drill schedule | Muscle memory beats panic. | Calendar invites, gamedays, CTF |
56+
57+
---
58+
59+
# 4. Detection and Triage Flow
60+
61+
1. **Alert fires or user reports an issue.**
62+
2. **First Reporter** opens a ticket in the transparent issue tracker (GitHub security advisory or private GitLab issue).
63+
3. **Triage Lead** checks severity matrix.
64+
4. If **P1**, spin up a temporary incident channel with a predefined template.
65+
5. Assign Leads and set T-minus deadlines.
66+
67+
| Pros | Cons |
68+
|------|------|
69+
| Fast and clear ownership | Relies on people in multiple time zones being awake |
70+
| Public log builds trust | Attackers also watch public data if over-shared |
71+
72+
---
73+
74+
# 5. Containment Options
75+
76+
| Method | When to use | Pros | Cons |
77+
|--------|-------------|------|------|
78+
| **Smart contract pause / circuit breaker** | Critical on-chain bug | Stops further damage instantly | Requires a pre-coded pause function and multisig |
79+
| **Multisig treasury freeze** | Key compromise or theft | No central keyholder | Coordination overhead |
80+
| **Host or pod quarantine** | Off-chain infra breach | Isolates without full shutdown | Needs orchestration rights |
81+
| **DNS or CDN reroute** | Phishing or DDoS | Quick traffic shift | May break some services |
82+
83+
Keep a one-liner command ready for each action and store it in the runbook.
84+
85+
---
86+
87+
# 6. Eradication and Recovery
88+
89+
1. Patch or replace vulnerable code.
90+
2. Peer review with at least two signers.
91+
3. Deploy to staging with replay of attack scenario.
92+
4. Roll forward to production by multisig or automated pipeline.
93+
5. Verify by monitoring metrics and logs for stability.
94+
95+
| Automation hint | Keep it simple |
96+
|-----------------|----------------|
97+
| GitHub Actions, ArgoCD, and Defender Autotasks are popular. | Always include a manual approval gate in case of false positives. |
98+
99+
---
100+
101+
# 7. Post-Incident Actions
102+
103+
| Step | Purpose | Tool Example |
104+
|------|---------|-------------|
105+
| **Retrospective within 72 h** | Capture lessons before they fade. | Miro board, Markdown doc in repo |
106+
| **Update runbooks and detection rules** | Prevent repeat events. | Docs-as-code PR |
107+
| **Reward community reporters** | Encourage transparency. | Bug bounty payouts, incentive model |
108+
| **Public disclosure** | Build long-term trust. | Blog post plus on-chain message |
109+
110+
---
111+
112+
# 8. Quick-Start Templates
113+
114+
| Need | Template location |
115+
|------|-------------------|
116+
| Incident channel message | /templates/incident-kickoff.md |
117+
| Retrospective form | /templates/retro-form.md |
118+
119+
---
120+
121+
# 9. Pros and Cons of Decentralized IR
122+
123+
| Aspect | Pros | Cons |
124+
|--------|------|------|
125+
| **No single point of failure** | Resilience if one keyholder is offline. | Slower consensus for urgent actions. |
126+
| **Community trust** | Transparent logs and multisig votes. | Public scrutiny can amplify panic. |
127+
| **Open tools** | Low cost, auditable, extensible. | Less vendor support, more DIY. |
128+
| **Identity plurality** | Flexibility for global teams. | Complex to manage revocation and role drift. |
129+
130+
---
131+
132+
# 10. Keep It Alive
133+
134+
- Run quarterly red team drills.
135+
- Rotate secrets on a fixed cadence.
136+
- Review identity proofs every six months.
137+
- Measure mean time to detect and contain.
138+
- Iterate on this framework during each retrospective.
139+
140+
> **Remember**: Simplicity plus strong fundamentals beat heavy processes every time.

‎src/incident-management/templates/incident-kickoff.md‎

Lines changed: 28 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
1+
**Incident ID:**
2+
**Date (UTC):**
3+
**Initial Severity:**
4+
**Current Status:** Open
5+
6+
## Summary
7+
One-sentence description of the issue
8+
9+
## Leads
10+
- **Triage Lead:** @handle
11+
- **Containment Lead:** @handle
12+
- **Comms Lead:** @handle
13+
- **Recorder:** @handle
14+
15+
## Key Links
16+
- Timeline doc:
17+
- Evidence bucket:
18+
- Severity matrix entry:
19+
20+
## Immediate Actions
21+
1.
22+
2.
23+
24+
## Next Checkpoint
25+
- **When:**
26+
- **Where:**
27+
28+
> This thread is the single source of truth. Keep replies factual and action-oriented.

‎src/incident-management/templates/retro-form.md‎

Lines changed: 34 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
1+
**Incident ID:**
2+
**Date Closed:**
3+
**Severity:**
4+
5+
## 1. What Happened
6+
Brief timeline highlights
7+
8+
## 2. Root Cause
9+
Single clear statement
10+
11+
## 3. What Went Well
12+
-
13+
14+
## 4. What Needs Improvement
15+
-
16+
17+
## 5. Action Items
18+
19+
| Owner | Task | Due date | Status |
20+
|-------|------|----------|--------|
21+
22+
## 6. Metrics
23+
24+
| Metric | Target | Actual |
25+
|--------|--------|--------|
26+
| Time to detect | | |
27+
| Time to contain | | |
28+
| Time to recover | | |
29+
30+
## 7. Lessons Learned
31+
Bullet summaries for the wiki
32+
33+
## 8. Follow Up Verification
34+
Date to review action item completion:

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)