-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
Add idx format #21289
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
SantaMcCloud
wants to merge
2
commits into
galaxyproject:dev
Choose a base branch
from
SantaMcCloud:add_idx_datatype
base: dev
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Add idx format #21289
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Another question is how to handle index versioning. Deacon has changed its index format multiple times already and they're only at version 0.13 of the tool. You probably have to define a dedicated class for this that inspects the file and stores the format version as metadata.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I assume that the version is stored somewhere in the metadata in the file istself. I did check with hexasum if there is an header but i didnt check the content. So what would be a good idea for this? write an siffer?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe just ask upstream about versioning and plans for the format. Based on this we can make a better decision.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
bede/deacon#70
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, index format used to be tied to the hash table implementation, and the format was not as dense as possible, leading to some churn. As mentioned in bede/deacon#70, format version 3 stores raw 2bit k-mers, meaning hash table implementation could be changed in a future Deacon version for faster performance without breaking the index and requiring a new format.
As of 0.13.0 I consider Deacon more or less feature complete, and 1.0.0 may come soon. I do not anticipate needing to change the index format again.
And yes, the
deacon index infoshows the index version. Index versions are validated at runtime and fail loudly.Let me know if you have any further questions, I'm excited to see Galaxy integration.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for both of your comments! This should help us to find a solution to implement deacon and the index format to galaxy!