Skip to content

[server][cdc][dvc] Stop populating replication_checkpoint_vector and remove offset-vector utility methods #10437

[server][cdc][dvc] Stop populating replication_checkpoint_vector and remove offset-vector utility methods

[server][cdc][dvc] Stop populating replication_checkpoint_vector and remove offset-vector utility methods #10437

Triggered via pull request February 24, 2026 22:32
Status Success
Total duration 12m 46s
Artifacts 19
Matrix: Clients / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Controller / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Integrations / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Internal / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Router / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Server / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: StaticAnalysis
ValidateGradleWrapper
11s
ValidateGradleWrapper
StaticAnalysisAndUnitTestsFailureAlert
0s
StaticAnalysisAndUnitTestsFailureAlert
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

16 errors
TestVeniceParentHelixAdminWithAcl.testUpdateAndGetAndDeleteAcl: services/venice-controller/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/controller/TestVeniceParentHelixAdminWithAcl.java#L123
org.mockito.exceptions.misusing.UnfinishedStubbingException: Unfinished stubbing detected here: -> at com.linkedin.venice.controller.TestVeniceParentHelixAdminWithAcl.testUpdateAndGetAndDeleteAcl(TestVeniceParentHelixAdminWithAcl.java:123) E.g. thenReturn() may be missing. Examples of correct stubbing: when(mock.isOk()).thenReturn(true); when(mock.isOk()).thenThrow(exception); doThrow(exception).when(mock).someVoidMethod(); Hints: 1. missing thenReturn() 2. you are trying to stub a final method, which is not supported 3. you are stubbing the behaviour of another mock inside before 'thenReturn' instruction is completed
TestVeniceParentHelixAdminWithAcl.testUpdateAndGetAndDeleteAcl: services/venice-controller/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/controller/TestVeniceParentHelixAdminWithAcl.java#L123
org.mockito.exceptions.misusing.UnfinishedStubbingException: Unfinished stubbing detected here: -> at com.linkedin.venice.controller.TestVeniceParentHelixAdminWithAcl.testUpdateAndGetAndDeleteAcl(TestVeniceParentHelixAdminWithAcl.java:123) E.g. thenReturn() may be missing. Examples of correct stubbing: when(mock.isOk()).thenReturn(true); when(mock.isOk()).thenThrow(exception); doThrow(exception).when(mock).someVoidMethod(); Hints: 1. missing thenReturn() 2. you are trying to stub a final method, which is not supported 3. you are stubbing the behaviour of another mock inside before 'thenReturn' instruction is completed
TestVeniceParentHelixAdminWithAcl.testUpdateAndGetAndDeleteAcl: services/venice-controller/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/controller/TestVeniceParentHelixAdminWithAcl.java#L123
org.mockito.exceptions.misusing.UnfinishedStubbingException: Unfinished stubbing detected here: -> at com.linkedin.venice.controller.TestVeniceParentHelixAdminWithAcl.testUpdateAndGetAndDeleteAcl(TestVeniceParentHelixAdminWithAcl.java:123) E.g. thenReturn() may be missing. Examples of correct stubbing: when(mock.isOk()).thenReturn(true); when(mock.isOk()).thenThrow(exception); doThrow(exception).when(mock).someVoidMethod(); Hints: 1. missing thenReturn() 2. you are trying to stub a final method, which is not supported 3. you are stubbing the behaviour of another mock inside before 'thenReturn' instruction is completed
TestVeniceParentHelixAdminWithAcl.testUpdateAndGetAndDeleteAcl: services/venice-controller/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/controller/TestVeniceParentHelixAdminWithAcl.java#L123
org.mockito.exceptions.misusing.UnfinishedStubbingException: Unfinished stubbing detected here: -> at com.linkedin.venice.controller.TestVeniceParentHelixAdminWithAcl.testUpdateAndGetAndDeleteAcl(TestVeniceParentHelixAdminWithAcl.java:123) E.g. thenReturn() may be missing. Examples of correct stubbing: when(mock.isOk()).thenReturn(true); when(mock.isOk()).thenThrow(exception); doThrow(exception).when(mock).someVoidMethod(); Hints: 1. missing thenReturn() 2. you are trying to stub a final method, which is not supported 3. you are stubbing the behaviour of another mock inside before 'thenReturn' instruction is completed
SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked: hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed( <any long> ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:523) However, there were exactly 2133 interactions with this mock: hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency( 2.0d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:2217) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency( 0.057106d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:774) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1807) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency( 0.076142d, 1771972729176L ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1485) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1490) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2834) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency( 0.064982d, 1771972729178L ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1485) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1490) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency( 0.0d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:2217) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency( 0.07506d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:774) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1807) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency( 0.04288d, 1771972729195L ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1485) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1490) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2834) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2834) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency( 0.0d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:2217) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency( 0.039694d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:774) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1807) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency( 0.0d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:2217) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency( 0.042058d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.check
SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked: hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed( <any long> ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:523) However, there were exactly 2133 interactions with this mock: hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency( 2.0d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:2217) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency( 0.057106d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:774) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1807) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency( 0.076142d, 1771972729176L ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1485) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1490) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2834) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency( 0.064982d, 1771972729178L ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1485) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1490) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency( 0.0d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:2217) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency( 0.07506d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:774) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1807) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency( 0.04288d, 1771972729195L ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1485) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1490) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2834) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2834) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency( 0.0d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:2217) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency( 0.039694d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:774) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1807) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency( 0.0d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:2217) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency( 0.042058d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.check
InstanceSizeEstimatorTest.testInstanceMeasurement: internal/venice-common/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/memory/InstanceSizeEstimatorTest.java#L49
java.lang.AssertionError: Memory allocated is negative! memoryAllocatedBeforeInstantiations: 2686899552; memoryAllocatedAfterInstantiations: 2650006496; memoryAllocatedByInstantiations: -36893056; 3 attempts left.
InstanceSizeEstimatorTest.testInstanceMeasurement: internal/venice-common/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/memory/InstanceSizeEstimatorTest.java#L49
java.lang.AssertionError: Memory allocated is negative! memoryAllocatedBeforeInstantiations: 2686899552; memoryAllocatedAfterInstantiations: 2650006496; memoryAllocatedByInstantiations: -36893056; 3 attempts left.
SITWithSAwarePWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testDataValidationCheckPointing[3](UNSORTED, AA_OFF): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithSAwarePWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked: logNotifier.completed( "TestTopic_5db65164a8_2ea553e4_v1", 1, <Capturing argument>, "STANDBY" ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.notifier.LogNotifier.completed(LogNotifier.java:27) However, there were exactly 1001 interactions with this mock: logNotifier.started( "TestTopic_5db65164a8_2ea553e4_v1", 1 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportStarted$1(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:117) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_5db65164a8_2ea553e4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{2} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_5db65164a8_2ea553e4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{3} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_5db65164a8_2ea553e4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{4} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_5db65164a8_2ea553e4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{5} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_5db65164a8_2ea553e4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{6} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_5db65164a8_2ea553e4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{7} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_5db65164a8_2ea553e4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{8} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_5db65164a8_2ea553e4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{9} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_5db65164a8_2ea553e4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{10} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_5db65164a8_2ea553e4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{11} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_5db65164a8_2ea553e4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{12} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_5db65164a8_2ea553e4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{13} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_5db65164a8_2ea553e4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{14} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_5db65164a8_2ea553e4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{15} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_5db65164a8_2ea553e4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{16} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$r
SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations: hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed( <any long> ); Wanted 2 times: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:523) But was 1 time: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2842)
SITWithSAwarePWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testDataValidationCheckPointing[3](UNSORTED, AA_OFF): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithSAwarePWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked: logNotifier.completed( "TestTopic_5db65164a8_2ea553e4_v1", 1, <Capturing argument>, "STANDBY" ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.notifier.LogNotifier.completed(LogNotifier.java:27) However, there were exactly 1001 interactions with this mock: logNotifier.started( "TestTopic_5db65164a8_2ea553e4_v1", 1 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportStarted$1(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:117) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_5db65164a8_2ea553e4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{2} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_5db65164a8_2ea553e4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{3} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_5db65164a8_2ea553e4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{4} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_5db65164a8_2ea553e4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{5} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_5db65164a8_2ea553e4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{6} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_5db65164a8_2ea553e4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{7} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_5db65164a8_2ea553e4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{8} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_5db65164a8_2ea553e4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{9} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_5db65164a8_2ea553e4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{10} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_5db65164a8_2ea553e4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{11} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_5db65164a8_2ea553e4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{12} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_5db65164a8_2ea553e4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{13} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_5db65164a8_2ea553e4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{14} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_5db65164a8_2ea553e4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{15} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_5db65164a8_2ea553e4_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{16} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$r
SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations: hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed( <any long> ); Wanted 2 times: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:523) But was 1 time: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2842)

Artifacts

Produced during runtime
Name Size Digest
StaticAnalysis
928 KB
sha256:c11d87511840f624b06572b8a863151dc4921b01c52f5a0c29de4a00d8f0b935
clients-jdk11
3.24 MB
sha256:b65283f72b5d289ec5d6e11cea1d9e8deb85f96d1022849b76a91ee22acf006c
clients-jdk17
3.24 MB
sha256:c3aeface0b52596b3e78442d9ed2e754956dc7e7863960696faeb2d7a2106da7
clients-jdk8
3.23 MB
sha256:eb82261b2d4c466f5712e57ec4f35fd02013256b5dead03f62affc3d7e6cf818
controller-jdk11
2.05 MB
sha256:db77d927f5dc60344cfa8246db3760569185dcf6ca4e44321f1a4b6df9a49166
controller-jdk17
2.02 MB
sha256:2fe7a56ff4b00a0d783e64de0164f2640193f9c250a3d30ca7623998d1f2603f
controller-jdk8
2.03 MB
sha256:d9b7730dd73f902abf0759e79eb23944587e39748d881f1ec26aeaf626d15058
integrations-jdk11
587 KB
sha256:833a05f13f53ae798bbb9e7b3cc0821d3bde09fb9490a0aa58c3444b354e0b62
integrations-jdk17
593 KB
sha256:410341c30c5ceac22f30008ec7f391aa9cd1adbe9f6beef2b9724e318aa1d2df
integrations-jdk8
575 KB
sha256:d8b1ac249f521ee4552f10fdcfb0607648c828d1122f5f909f20c1cbe79fb721
internal-jdk11
4.36 MB
sha256:f0977d36452a9ce4acfb322c3743fc7967ba189b59c039f963eae8d76068a16c
internal-jdk17
4.38 MB
sha256:bcc15ec88ac878703e2874b034457240f524cf60ee95bc5822c661a13262db08
internal-jdk8
4.35 MB
sha256:4f075d44e253cc1092b79c5be16dd3a731d32c1d73539283e48d84b20211b088
router-jdk11
777 KB
sha256:cbf77e648bf39100fba2f3482d6a67a6f6cd6cd9e5b31fa71eb4de3d28c448eb
router-jdk17
776 KB
sha256:e59896f032f2ccd5dad91681c6dd29144cc45394553566e77cc4323b2116c148
router-jdk8
764 KB
sha256:40c9a790cf2376f69eb295109a3ef76943e5fb15810d3e19f00b13580fa1ce3e
server-jdk11
11.1 MB
sha256:61fd695435ca9b62387adbb13e4312f8648540bf7bf9fda5d719b60f68bb0b1d
server-jdk17
11.2 MB
sha256:ef917fc40e135c89ce26c06e2fafa09e62ec7b7b7aafb88a5a5c0d6deb9a6a9d
server-jdk8
11.1 MB
sha256:8d795f41130f5cec8ade1362bee4b1cc1e081b69dff0ea364f0c38db3ad8ecd2