chore: make function comment match function name

[rocksload]

Summary

make function comment match function name

Changes

• What was changed and why
• Any notable design decisions or trade-offs

Type of change

• Bug fix
• Feature
• Refactor
• Documentation
• Chore/CI

Affected areas

• Core (Go)
• Transports (HTTP)
• Providers/Integrations
• Plugins
• UI (Next.js)
• Docs

How to test

Describe the steps to validate this change. Include commands and expected outcomes.

# Core/Transports
go version
go test ./...

# UI
cd ui
pnpm i || npm i
pnpm test || npm test
pnpm build || npm run build

If adding new configs or environment variables, document them here.

Screenshots/Recordings

If UI changes, add before/after screenshots or short clips.

Breaking changes

• Yes
• No

If yes, describe impact and migration instructions.

Related issues

Link related issues and discussions. Example: Closes #123

Security considerations

Note any security implications (auth, secrets, PII, sandboxing, etc.).

Checklist

• I read docs/contributing/README.md and followed the guidelines
• I added/updated tests where appropriate
• I updated documentation where needed
• I verified builds succeed (Go and UI)
• I verified the CI pipeline passes locally if applicable

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Refactor
  • Updated internal method naming conventions for improved code clarity and consistency.

Walkthrough

Two exported identifiers are renamed to improve API clarity: sendInProgressResponsesChunk becomes sendInProgressEventResponsesChunk, and ToBifrostRequest becomes ToBifrostChatRequest. No functional logic is altered.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Function Renaming core/providers/utils.go	sendInProgressResponsesChunk renamed to sendInProgressEventResponsesChunk; comment updated
Method Renaming core/schemas/providers/anthropic/chat.go	ToBifrostRequest() on AnthropicMessageRequest renamed to ToBifrostChatRequest()

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

• Both changes are straightforward, homogeneous renamings with no logic modifications.
• No complex interactions or control flow changes to evaluate.

Poem

🐰 A hop, a skip, a name so new,
Functions dressed in clearer hue,
Chat requests now true to form,
Progress events transform the norm,
We rename with joy and ease,
Clarity flows like morning breeze!

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (4 warnings)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Linked Issues Check	⚠️ Warning	The linked issue #123 requires implementing File APIs support for providers like OpenAI and Anthropic, with the ability to upload files for use cases such as fine-tuning, RAG, and larger context storage. The changes in this PR consist of renaming two functions (sendInProgressResponsesChunk to sendInProgressEventResponsesChunk and ToBifrostRequest to ToBifrostChatRequest) in utility and Anthropic chat modules. These function renames do not implement any File API endpoints, upload functionality, or related features required by issue #123, and therefore do not meet the primary coding objectives outlined in the linked issue.	The PR does not implement any of the requirements from issue #123. Either the wrong issue was linked (this PR should not be linked to #123), or the PR is incomplete and should include the actual File API implementation work as specified in the issue.
Out of Scope Changes Check	⚠️ Warning	The linked issue #123 specifies the need to add File API support for providers, including upload endpoints and related functionality. The actual changes in this PR are limited to renaming two functions: sendInProgressResponsesChunk to sendInProgressEventResponsesChunk in the utils module and ToBifrostRequest to ToBifrostChatRequest in the Anthropic chat module. These function renames have no connection to implementing File APIs, upload mechanisms, or any of the features described in issue #123. The entire PR appears to be out of scope for the stated linked issue.	Review and verify the correct issue should be linked to this PR. If this is truly a standalone refactoring effort to rename functions for code clarity, it should either be linked to a different issue that addresses code maintenance or have no issue link if it's a general cleanup. If issue #123 is the intended target, significant additional work is needed to actually implement the File API support as specified.
Description Check	⚠️ Warning	The PR description follows the template structure but contains significant issues. The "Changes" section is incomplete with only placeholder text and no actual description of what was changed or why. More critically, the type of change is marked as "Documentation" and affected area as "Docs", but the actual changes are function/method renames in Go code, which should be categorized as "Refactor" under "Core (Go)" and "Providers/Integrations". Additionally, all checklist items remain unchecked, and critical sections like "Related issues" and "Security considerations" are left as placeholders, making the description largely incomplete and inaccurate.	Please update the PR description to accurately reflect the changes: mark "Refactor" as the type of change, check "Core (Go)" and "Providers/Integrations" as affected areas, provide a detailed summary in the "Changes" section explaining the function renames and their purpose, and ensure all critical sections are properly filled out rather than left as placeholders.
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 50.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.

✅ Passed checks (1 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title Check	✅ Passed	The PR title "chore: make function comment match function name" refers to updating comments to match function names, which is part of what's happening in the changeset. However, the actual changes involve renaming two functions/methods across two files (sendInProgressResponsesChunk → sendInProgressEventResponsesChunk and ToBifrostRequest → ToBifrostChatRequest), which represents the primary scope of the refactoring. The title captures the comment-update aspect but doesn't clearly communicate the core change, which is the function/method renaming itself, making it only partially descriptive of the main changeset.

✨ Finishing touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8562efd and 40d09eb.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• core/providers/utils.go (1 hunks)
• core/schemas/providers/anthropic/chat.go (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (2)

core/providers/utils.go (1)

371-372: Rename verified successfully.

All internal callers have been updated to use the new function name sendInProgressEventResponsesChunk. The function is called in three locations within the core/providers package (anthropic.go, bedrock.go, cohere.go), and all references have been properly updated. No remnants of the old function name exist in the codebase.

core/schemas/providers/anthropic/chat.go (1)

11-12: Method rename is complete, but reveals an architectural inconsistency in the Anthropic integration.

The old ToBifrostRequest() method has been fully removed with zero call sites. The new ToBifrostChatRequest() method is called in OpenAI, Gemini, and Groq integrations.

However, in transports/bifrost-http/integrations/anthropic.go:54, the Anthropic integration uses ToBifrostResponsesRequest() instead of the renamed ToBifrostChatRequest(). While this is a deliberate architectural choice (Anthropic's messages API maps to Bifrost's ResponsesRequest type), the method name on AnthropicMessageRequest is now misleading since it's not actually used for chat in Anthropic's integration—only by the Groq provider.

Consider renaming to ToBifrostResponsesRequest() in core/schemas/providers/anthropic/chat.go:12 for consistency, or document why this method is named "ChatRequest" when it's architecturally used as a "ResponsesRequest."

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[rocksload]

Thanks!