Currently, we have the @propertysource and the definition of @beans in the same configuration. That situation doesn't allow easily to extend the starter and to load custom defined values before the standard values already predefined in the starter code.
I think that it should be a great idea if we could separate them into two different configuration classes, one for property source and another for beans.
Currently, we have the @propertysource and the definition of @beans in the same configuration. That situation doesn't allow easily to extend the starter and to load custom defined values before the standard values already predefined in the starter code.
I think that it should be a great idea if we could separate them into two different configuration classes, one for property source and another for beans.