Common label for concepts of the ontology (domain specific and eclass)

[marcofranke]

Currently, we have domain specific concepts and eclass based concepts. Both kinds of concepts use different labeling mechanism in Marmotta to describe the label of the concept. The index/core concepts have to be a harmonized at least in the index/core Concepts. Otherwise, the user cannot find any concept.

[marcofranke]

Dear all, I discussed with Felix today that an ontology concept and an eclass have a translation label. In both cases, it should be named the same within the index. That means, in both scenarios the translation is located below the same translation labels (same index/core fields).

If a concept has no translation for a specific chosen language, we will use the translation label for English. That means, for each concept in NIMBLE at least a label for the English language have to be available.

[iot365]

Here are two examples concepts from from the Furniture Ontology and from eClass to show the differences:

• Furniture Sector Ontology:

<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.aidimme.es/FurnitureSectorOntology.owl#Leather">
	<rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class"/>
	<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="http://www.aidimme.es/FurnitureSectorOntology.owl#Upholstery"/>
	<FurnitureSectorOntology1:translation xml:lang="es">Cuero</FurnitureSectorOntology1:translation>
	<owl:disjointWith rdf:resource="http://www.aidimme.es/FurnitureSectorOntology.owl#Polyskin"/>
</rdf:Description>

• eClass:

<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.nimble-project.org/resource/eclass/35040404">
	<rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#Concept"/>
	<rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.nimble-project.org/onto/eclass#CodeConcept"/>
	<dcterms:identifier>0173-1#01-AAU379#014</dcterms:identifier>
	<dcterms:hasVersion>014</dcterms:hasVersion>
	<dcterms:issued rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#date">2017-01-30</dcterms:issued>
	<skos:prefLabel xml:lang="en">Leather article (semifinished product)</skos:prefLabel>
	<dcterms:language>en</dcterms:language>
	<dcterms:publisher>0173-1</dcterms:publisher>
</rdf:Description>

Harmonisation can be done by keyword search. To my understanding, a "true" mapping between the related conecpts cannot automatically be derived.