Skip to content

Negative citation timespan #4

@essepuntato

Description

@essepuntato

Even if it is possible that negative citation timespan exist, it would be good to check them, since some can be actually mistakes in the source data.

For instance see the citations of 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1996.00099.x. Here there are at least two examples, i.e. oci:020010008003600000201080803093701090907370101010000090209-0200101010136193701060001630502020337010909063700000009093733 and oci:0200100080036000809020700010437020000003709050202080003-0200101010136193701060001630502020337010909063700000009093733, that have a negative citation timespan, and this seems to be due to the data originally contained in Crossref that are not correct.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    bugSomething isn't working

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions