Even if we don't use them all in GeoSPARQL Next, we should create vocabs for RCC*, perhaps RCC23 and RCC62, as per:
OuYang, J., Fu, Q., Liu, D. (2007). A Model for Representing Topological Relations Between Simple Concave Regions. In: Shi, Y., van Albada, G.D., Dongarra, J., Sloot, P.M.A. (eds) Computational Science – ICCS 2007. ICCS 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4487. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72584-8_21
Such establishment will allow us to relate them all.
- we need to research all the RCCs out there
- do we have OGC or ISO versions of these somewhere?
Even if we don't use them all in GeoSPARQL Next, we should create vocabs for RCC*, perhaps RCC23 and RCC62, as per:
OuYang, J., Fu, Q., Liu, D. (2007). A Model for Representing Topological Relations Between Simple Concave Regions. In: Shi, Y., van Albada, G.D., Dongarra, J., Sloot, P.M.A. (eds) Computational Science – ICCS 2007. ICCS 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4487. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72584-8_21
Such establishment will allow us to relate them all.