-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 666
CONSOLE-4880: Bump 'yup' version #15737
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
krishagarwal278
wants to merge
7
commits into
openshift:main
Choose a base branch
from
krishagarwal278:CONSOLE-4880
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+661
−539
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c21999b
Build worked and tests are passing
krishagarwal278 f90a110
Fixed build test failures
krishagarwal278 4601585
i18n fixes
krishagarwal278 ae3c044
replaced nameRegex with bitBucketUserNameRegex, err.type required, su…
krishagarwal278 2633cb0
e2e test failure
krishagarwal278 685a5fa
switching to original callback style
krishagarwal278 7a62519
Fixed most of the e2e tests
krishagarwal278 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Make cross-field
minReplicas/maxReplicaschecks null-safe to avoid unintended validation failuresAs written, the cross-field tests assume both
minReplicasandmaxReplicasare always present and thatthis.parentis never undefined:maxReplicaswhileminReplicasis still empty/undefined, themaxReplicastest will still run and evaluateminReplicas <= maxReplicas, which can fail purely becauseminReplicasis unset. That effectively makesminReplicasrequired even though the schema does not mark it as required.minReplicasside, and both tests destructurethis.parentwithout a guard, which is fragile if the parent shape is ever absent or restructured.To keep the UX predictable and avoid spurious cross-field errors, it’s safer to:
null/undefined.this.parentbefore destructuring.Example patch:
spec: yup.object({ minReplicas: yup .number() .test(isInteger(t('devconsole~Minimum Pods must be an integer.'))) .min(1, t('devconsole~Minimum Pods must greater than or equal to 1.')) .test( 'test-less-than-max', t('devconsole~Minimum Pods should be less than or equal to Maximum Pods.'), function (minReplicas) { - const { maxReplicas } = this.parent; - return minReplicas <= maxReplicas; + const { maxReplicas } = this.parent || {}; + if (minReplicas == null || maxReplicas == null) { + // Don’t enforce cross-field constraint until both values are set + return true; + } + return minReplicas <= maxReplicas; }, ), maxReplicas: yup .number() .test(isInteger(t('devconsole~Maximum Pods must be an integer.'))) .max( Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER, t('devconsole~Value is larger than maximum value allowed.'), ) .test( 'test-greater-than-min', t('devconsole~Maximum Pods should be greater than or equal to Minimum Pods.'), function (maxReplicas) { - const { minReplicas } = this.parent; - return minReplicas <= maxReplicas; + const { minReplicas } = this.parent || {}; + if (minReplicas == null || maxReplicas == null) { + // Only validate the relationship when both sides are present + return true; + } + return minReplicas <= maxReplicas; }, ) .required(t('devconsole~Max Pods must be defined.')), }),This keeps the intended invariant (
minReplicas <= maxReplicas) while avoiding turningminReplicasinto an implicit required field and makes the validation more robust to shape changes.Also applies to: 39-54
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents