BUG: Fix concat dtype preservation through concat #61893
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
added 3 commits
July 17, 2025 20:36
added 3 commits
July 17, 2025 23:26
- change concat function to handle empty elements
…ld concat as a categorical.
adrienpacifico
changed the title
adrienpacifico
changed the title
adrienpacifico
changed the title
|
As mentioned in #51362, this is not a bug, but we are willing to support this via a keyword in pd.concat. I think there are also some older related issues this would close. Can you make sure those are listed in the OP. |
simonjayhawkins
added
Reshaping
|
Closing this for now — I ran into more complexity than expected. Might revisit later with a cleaner approach. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
doc/source/whatsnew/vX.X.X.rstfile if fixing a bug or adding a new feature.Expected behavior:
Linked issues:
#13524 see #13524 (comment)
#39443
#14177 (seems a dev call agreed on putting this as an option in
concat)#13767